Afghanistan - Sending Our Losingest Warriors Abroad - Drugs Forum
Drugs-Forum  
News Groups Blog Forum Chat Video Audio Images Documents Wiki Home
Go Back   Drugs Forum > VARIOUS DRUG RELATED TOPICS > Drug News > Politics (News)
Register Tags Mark Forums Read

Notices

Politics (News) News about drug policy and how drugs influence politics.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 21-07-2009, 14:30
Junkhead23's Avatar
Junkhead23 Junkhead23 is offline
Palladium Member
 
Join Date: 27-08-2008
Location: In the clouds
Posts: 1,742
Blog Entries: 5
Junkhead23 must live here.Junkhead23 must live here.Junkhead23 must live here.Junkhead23 must live here.Junkhead23 must live here.Junkhead23 must live here.Junkhead23 must live here.
Points: 12,493, Level: 16 Points: 12,493, Level: 16 Points: 12,493, Level: 16
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Sending Our Losingest Warriors Abroad

In response to the disconcerting newsthat the Obama Administration is sending dozens of DEA agents to Afghanistan, Kelley Vlahos writes

right align image
Does anyone else think it odd and just a bit mission creepy that “the most prolific expansion in DEA history” would occur on foreign soil? This expansion, or “surge,” will come in the form of “dozens of DEA agents” descending on Afghanistan, because, as one DEA official pointed out, after eight years of fighting to prop up the central government there, President Hamid Karzai & Co. are apparently unwilling and unable to resolve the drug problem themselves.
So, enter the American Drug War, Afghan style. Unfettered by anything resembling the U.S Constitution, DEA agents are seemingly given carte blanche to go after Afghan drug kingpins belonging to the Taliban or “influential tribes allied with it” and hauling them back to U.S federal courts if need be. Their task also includes pursuing corrupt government officials fingered as assisting the $4 billion drug trade.


Why do I label this news disconcerting?

-- Ultimately the only effective way to stop enemies abroad from enriching themselves off black markets in narcotics is to legalize drugs, thereby ending the black markets. The idea that sending a few dozen DEA agents to Afghanistan will solve the problem is fantasy that is contradicted by decades of experience.
-- These DEA agents, who will be "unfettered by anything resembling the US Constitution," are inevitably going to return to the United States, where they'll be sorely tempted to employ the most effective methods that they learn abroad on American citizens. It is a bad idea to militarize civilian law enforcement personnel!
-- This seems to be just one more way that the executive branch can sidestep Congress while increasing America's foreign entanglements. In the future will we send DEA agents to any country where drugs are being produced and enriching terrorist organizations? Which is to say, will we send them anywhere and everywhere?

by Conor Friedersdorf
Source - http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.co...rs-abroad.html
Attached Images
File Type: jpg opium_poppy_big.jpg (13.0 KB, 22 views)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
afghanistan, dea agents, opium trade

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


Sitelinks: Site Functions:

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 14:14.


Copyright: Substance Information Network 2003 - 2009, All rights reserved