WIRETAPS UP; OFFICIALS CITE TECHNOLOGY - Drugs Forum
Drugs-Forum  
News Groups Blog Forum Chat Video Audio Images Documents Wiki Home
Go Back   Drugs Forum > VARIOUS DRUG RELATED TOPICS > Law and order
Register Tags Mark Forums Read

Notices

Law and order Drug law, arrests, court cases, law enforcement & the legal situation of drugs.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-05-2005, 17:07
Alfa's Avatar
Alfa Alfa is offline
Alfa is temporary out of order
Productive insomniac
Administrator
 
Join Date: 14-01-2003
Location: Netherlands
Age: 94
Posts: 20,321
Blog Entries: 2
Alfa is a true resource and beyond reputeAlfa is a true resource and beyond reputeAlfa is a true resource and beyond reputeAlfa is a true resource and beyond reputeAlfa is a true resource and beyond reputeAlfa is a true resource and beyond reputeAlfa is a true resource and beyond reputeAlfa is a true resource and beyond reputeAlfa is a true resource and beyond reputeAlfa is a true resource and beyond reputeAlfa is a true resource and beyond repute
Points: 122,853, Level: 50 Points: 122,853, Level: 50 Points: 122,853, Level: 50
Activity: 92% Activity: 92% Activity: 92%



WIRETAPS UP; OFFICIALS CITE TECHNOLOGY


WASHINGTON - The number of court-authorized wiretaps jumped 19 percent last year as investigators pursued drug and other cases against increasingly tech-savvy suspects. Every surveillance request made by authorities was granted.


Federal and state judges approved 1,710 applications for wiretaps of wire, oral or electronic communications last year, and four states - New York, California, New Jersey and Florida - accounted for three of every four surveillance orders, according to the Administrative Office of the U.S.


Courts. That agency is required to collect the figures and report them to Congress.


The numbers, released Thursday, do not include court orders for terror-related investigations under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, known as FISA, which reached a record 1,754 warrants last year, according to the Justice Department.


In nonterrorist criminal investigations, federally approved wiretaps increased 26 percent in a year, to 730 applications, while state judges approved 980 wiretaps, an increase of 13 percent.


Department of Justice spokesman Kevin Madden said the numbers reflect "an increase in the resources geared toward targeting very serious federal and state offenses for which electronic surveillance is often the most, and sometimes the only, effective investigative method."


Timothy Edgar, legislative counsel for the American Civil Liberties Union, said traditional law-enforcement work is catching up with increases in anti-terror wiretaps.


"We're still seeing a huge trend toward increased surveillance," Edgar said.


Evan Barr, a former federal prosecutor in New York City, now in private practice, said authorities are responding to changes in the ways criminal suspects use technology.


"Drug dealers now are making use not just of traditional cell phones but a variety of devices, including Blackberries, pagers and Nextels. So most likely these increased wiretap numbers simply reflect law enforcement's continuing efforts to keep pace with both the tactics and technology that is being used on the street," Barr said.


Officials said most of the applications, some 1,308, were for drug investigations, while racketeering or gambling wiretaps accounted for a combined 128 wiretaps across the country.


Homicides and assaults produced 48 wiretap orders.


Some 1,507 wiretaps - or about 9 out of every 10 - targeted portable devices, such as cell phones and pagers.


By the end of the year, the surveillance had generated 4,506 arrests and


634 convictions based on wiretap evidence.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


Sitelinks: Site Functions:

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 14:25.


Copyright: Substance Information Network 2003 - 2009, All rights reserved