USA - House Votes to Have FDA Regulate Tobacco - Drugs Forum
Drugs-Forum  
News Groups Blog Forum Chat Video Audio Images Documents Wiki Home
Go Back   Drugs Forum > VARIOUS DRUG RELATED TOPICS > Drug News > Politics (News)
Register Tags Mark Forums Read

Notices

Politics (News) News about drug policy and how drugs influence politics.

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old 02-04-2009, 19:13
Milk man Milk man is offline
Titanium Member
 
Join Date: 22-05-2008
Location: Earth
Age: 19
Posts: 245
Milk man is a captain of the SWIM team.Milk man is a captain of the SWIM team.
Points: 688, Level: 4 Points: 688, Level: 4 Points: 688, Level: 4
Activity: 1% Activity: 1% Activity: 1%
House Votes to Have FDA Regulate Tobacco

House Votes to Have FDA Regulate Tobacco

WASHINGTON --The House on Thursday overwhelmingly passed legislation giving the U.S. Food and Drug Administration power to regulate tobacco.

The vote passed 298-112. The bill faces an uphill battle in the Senate, however, where lawmakers from tobacco-producing states oppose the legislation.

The bill doesn't give the FDA power to ban existing tobacco products but gives the agency power to restrict sales on safety grounds. The FDA also would be able to stop companies from touting their brands as "low tar" and "mild" and restrict advertising to plain black-and-white ads. Health advocates say advertising restrictions are a key tool to keeping tobacco products away from children and young adults.

The bill passed the House last July but wasn't pushed in the Senate amid concerns that then-President George W. Bush would veto it. President Barack Obama backed the bill while in the Senate, and the White House said it "strongly supports" the legislation, suggesting the legislation may have more legs in the Senate this time.

But a senator from one of the largest tobacco-producing states, Sen. Richard Burr (R., N.C.), has threatened to filibuster the bill.

Rep. Mike Rogers (R., Mich.) said he was concerned the legislation would overburden the FDA and take away resources from other areas of the agency. But Rep. Henry Waxman (D., Calif.), who sponsored the bill, said money from the FDA's general fund would be used on tobacco regulation for only the first six months. After that, it would be funded by the tobacco industry via user fees. Rep. Waxman said money borrowed from the general fund would be paid back by the user fees.

Philip Morris USA, a unit of Altria Group Inc., has provided key support for the bill. The company has argued that FDA oversight would create a stable framework to allow companies to make "safer" products.

Most other tobacco companies, including Lorillard Inc., oppose the bill. They argue that the legislation would allow Philip Morris, the largest cigarette maker in the U.S., to cement its sales lead, since the FDA would likely prohibit tobacco firms from developing new product lines.

By JARED A. FAVOLE and ALICIA MUNDY

April 2, 2009

Reputation Comments on this post:
  
  Good job finding this news article
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
USA - Finally! Impeach Bush is Here! Panthers007 Drug Policy Reform & Narco Politics 77 03-08-2008 10:50
Drug info - Tobacco Use - A Cross-cultural Comparison / History & Usage 0utrider Tobacco 2 30-04-2008 07:42
Health - Tobacco Harm Reduction Lunar Loops Tobacco 0 25-04-2007 13:18
Monoply in the tobacco industry? Shiacmkmleer Miscellaneous News 0 26-02-2007 13:38
US House Votes for Boilogical Drug War Weapons motorhead Drug Policy Reform & Narco Politics 15 28-03-2006 12:51


Sitelinks: Site Functions:

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 00:35.


Copyright: Substance Information Network 2003 - 2009, All rights reserved