|
| News Groups Blog Forum Chat Video Audio Images Documents Wiki Home |
|
|||||||
| Register | Tags | FAQ n Rules | Mark Forums Read |
| Notices |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
Meth vs Crack
Recently swim's rabbit decided instead of reupping on ingredients, he'd just pick up some hard from downtown.
It was swim's rabbit's first time with crack, and his hampster friend was showing him how the smoking technique is a little different. Swim's rabbit decided to drop a little in a bulb, and it still fired up just fine and produced the same effect as the tube + brass filter method he was being taught. Swim's rabbit is wondering, why is the 'appropriate' method different from meth? Why was the hampster teaching him to let the flame hit the hard? Is there something behind that method that makes it better? (Swim USFSE for his hampster first but didn't find a clear answer) |
|
#2
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
Re: Meth vs Crack
SWIM's crack fiend friends almost always smoke hard out of a soda can with holes punched in it. Sometimes they use a "stem"(glass tube with brillo(choreboy) stuffed in it. They always put the flame directly on the rock.
SWIM thinks that most people who smoke crack are not very educated and do not realize that freebase cocaine would be more effective if it was vaporized like in a meth style lightbulb pipe. SWIM is sure that the intense heat of direct flame destroys some of the freebase and it never gets vaporized therefore wasting product. Modern "crack" is generally basified with sodium bicarbonate and much of the soda remains in the rock swim thinks. This preperation may actually need direct flame heat to vaporize the freebase. The stuff in the 1980s was primarely basified with ammonia and extracted with ether, leaving a more pure freebase which would probably vaporize much easier than crack made with baking soda. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Meth vs Crack
Based on Swim's experience with cocaine and crack, most today is made using sodium bicarbonate and water. However, it is a very poor method that causes impurity in the final product. Older crack was made using ammonia and cocaine only. It produces a remarkably pure, clean product without taste/smell issues, like baking soda rock.
Is crack not just base form of cocaine? Swim was under the impression there were three common cocaine forms: Salt, Base, And Freebase, being Cocaine powder, Crack, and Freebase cocaine. Freebase was made with ether. Crack is smoked directly, whereas freebase has to be vaporized, like in those funny glass bong like freebase pipes that they used to sell. The cleaner the crack the better it will burn. Bad product can need the direct flame more than clean crack. |
|
#4
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
Re: Meth vs Crack
Well, swim's rabbit noticed a higher ability to control the crack in the bulb vs. the stem. It could be vaporized and recrack and hit again for 30 minutes or more (on two 'hits' worth) when a hit or two in the stem was burning up within 3-4 minutes.
Swim's rabbit thinks he'll grab a few more grams worth and see how it works next time, keeping more in-line with his tweaker side and using the bulb. Swims hampster definately thinks he can make it last like tweak using a bulb (or any other non-direct-flame method). |
|
#5
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
Re: Meth vs Crack
SWIM has always wanted to get an 8-ball of good quality coke and try the ammonia/ether method of making freebase. He says this would vaporize nicely. As many people know, this is how Richard Pryor set himself on fire. He was jacked up and lit his lighter while the room was full of ether vapor. BOOM!!
|
|
#7
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
Re: Meth vs Crack
From what SWIM has read, generally it was young black males with no knowledge of the hazards of volatile chemicals that were making freebase. Overtime they had a lot of incidents involving fires and burns from improperly using ether. Because of these accidents they switched to sodium bicarb. People began calling it "crack" because of the sound it made when it was smoked. The water left in the crack boiled and made the crackling sound. Before this people just called it "freebase".
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Meth vs Crack
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Effects - Crack vs. smoked Meth (which is more powerful/which is worse) | theWasp | Methamphetamine | 11 | 06-08-2008 21:15 |
| Crystal meth usage 'rivals crack' - ACPO report (UK) | klaatu | Miscellaneous News | 0 | 15-02-2008 14:47 |
| Drug info - Crack: Decay in the Inner Cities of | beentheredonethatagain | Cocaine & Crack | 0 | 18-11-2007 22:03 |
| Meth Overview from "Anti-Drug" standpoint (Nothing new) | DrMuffy | Methamphetamine | 2 | 23-06-2007 13:55 |
| Paper beating Meth drum a little too loud | renegades | Miscellaneous News | 0 | 23-02-2007 16:29 |
| Sitelinks: | Site Functions: |