|
| News Groups Blog Forum Chat Video Audio Images Documents Wiki Home |
|
|||||||
| Register | Tags | FAQ n Rules | Mark Forums Read |
| Notices |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
This is the summation of the outcomes from studies by Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research (PEAR)
Abstract — Strong correlations between output distribution means of a variety of random binary processes and pre- stated intentions of some 100 individual human operators have been established over a 12-year experimental program. More than 1000 experimental series, employing four different categories of random devices and several distinctive protocols, show comparable magnitudes of anomalous mean shifts from chance expectation, with similar distribution structures. Although the absolute effect sizes are quite small, of the order of 10–4 bits deviation per bit processed, over the huge databases accumulated the composite effect exceeds 7σ (p a 3.5 × 10–13). These data display significant disparities between female and male operator performances, and consistent serial position effects in individual and collective results. Data generated by operators far removed from the machines and exerting their efforts at times other than those of machine operation show similar effect sizes and structural details to those of the local, on-time experiments. Most other secondary parameters tested are found to have little effect on the scale and character of the results, with one important exception: studies performed using fully deterministic pseudorandom sources, either hard-wired or algorithmic, yield null overall mean shifts, and display no other anomalous features. http://www.princeton.edu/~pear/pdfs/correlations.pdf Wasn't sure if this had been published in here, posting it in news as well |
|
#2
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
Re: Correlations of Random Binary Sequences with Pre-Stated Operator Intention
stupid question. these binarial code beats. it is basically certain frequencies were talking about here right? so it is in essense the same as people listening to certain music which varies in frequencies & causes mixed emotions. so people listening to alot of certain rock music are generally violent & have alot of emotional problems, & people who listen to trance music or melodical music such as operah etc are generally 'programmed' with a good frequency & are quite happy easy going people.
good vibrations...... there's a lot of good coding on certain music easier than the lil morse codes. but to have it down to a fine studied way like this is interesting. perhaps good producers in music could study & benefit from this, but perhaps it's an aquired gift to some already?
Last edited by sylenth; 08-08-2008 at 11:40. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Correlations of Random Binary Sequences with Pre-Stated Operator Intention
From that article I took they were studying ones ability to manipulate something random into what one desires.
From what I read they tried this. People can have intent for an event that is based on natural random events (not pseudo-random data that your computer uses), and there is a measurable effect of that intent upon the outcome...regardless of space-time. The source of randomness ( a natural random source, like the fluctuations of voltage or temperature or anything that is measured) is what ultimately defined the output and that is something that is chaotic in nature. maybe the concept is they test is that if things are truly chaotic, that personal will power can form something more ordered out of something effectively uniform. music definitely has its energy direction and their is target audiences, its just there is individuals who create the music so ultimately they chose what to represent then people decide whether they like it or not...not always as an individual or based on objective reasoning. It's hard to say which is a product of which. The people willed the music maker to make his tune, the tune created the people to want the tune, the music maker made the tune to bring together the people. |
|
#4
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
Re: Correlations of Random Binary Sequences with Pre-Stated Operator Intention
thanx for a better understanding & explanation. very interesting studies.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Correlations of Random Binary Sequences with Pre-Stated Operator Intention
Noetic sciences (who founded alot of the information used in what the bleep) have tried to take this groups studies alot further.
I like this study, and I don't think that the fact the measurable difference being small is a bad thing. Mostly because I see 3 relative groups 1. Those who can affect something in the way they wish. 2. Those who have no effect regardless of their wish. 3. Those who will get the opposite of what they wish. no2 shouldn't overly effect the outcome, but just as easily no1 and no3 could have canceled each other out in terms of the publics overall ability. Infact, the difference between no1 and no3 could be quite simple and there may well be psychological mechanisms that could be re aligned to convert the majority of no3's into no1's. Perhaps even no2's just need to be more aware of things. on the doco Super High me, he had a great lil test of psychic ability when straight and when he'd been stoned for like 20 days straight...had a 7 fold increase in psychic potential |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
| Sitelinks: | Site Functions: |