Health - Human testing with a untested RC? - Drugs Forum
Drugs-Forum  
News Groups Blog Forum Chat Video Audio Images Documents Wiki Home
Go Back   Drugs Forum > CHEMICAL & (SEMI-) SYNTHETIC DRUGS > Research Chemicals
Register Tags Mark Forums Read

Notices

Research Chemicals Piperazines, Phenethylamines, Tryptamines & other Research Chemicals or designer drugs.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-06-2008, 20:38
fnord's Avatar
fnord Gold member fnord is nu online
Gold Member
 
Join Date: 08-12-2003
Location: Tromaville
Posts: 5,587
Blog Entries: 4
fnord must mainline Medlinefnord must mainline Medlinefnord must mainline Medlinefnord must mainline Medlinefnord must mainline Medlinefnord must mainline Medlinefnord must mainline Medlinefnord must mainline Medlinefnord must mainline Medlinefnord must mainline Medlinefnord must mainline Medline
Points: 21,081, Level: 21 Points: 21,081, Level: 21 Points: 21,081, Level: 21
Activity: 14% Activity: 14% Activity: 14%
Human testing with a untested RC?

Grandma had a dream that she will soon be testing a compound that has no known human use,she understands that there will be risks invovled and wishes to minimise them. any ideas and suggestion would be great. have it from one of the leading experts that the estimated dose is 2-6mg but the largest human test ive heard of is 1.5-2mg Grandma was going to start with .5 to test for any interactions she might have,then in the next day or 2 try 1.5mgs then 2.0 5 days later then 2.5 5 more days later. What problems should be looked for? when should grandma stop increasing the dose? What ranges of BP/pulse would indicate a potential problem? The compound in question is ¨luciginol¨. Any and all advice would be nice she has noticed alot of people saying to be carefull with this one,is there some sort of red flag in it chemical structure? or is this an all around warning for untested substances?

http://www.drugs-forum.com/forum/showthread.php?t=56640
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-06-2008, 21:30
RaverHippie's Avatar
RaverHippie Gold member RaverHippie is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: 07-11-2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 3,425
Blog Entries: 3
RaverHippie must think in IUPACRaverHippie must think in IUPACRaverHippie must think in IUPACRaverHippie must think in IUPACRaverHippie must think in IUPACRaverHippie must think in IUPACRaverHippie must think in IUPACRaverHippie must think in IUPACRaverHippie must think in IUPACRaverHippie must think in IUPACRaverHippie must think in IUPAC
Points: 9,204, Level: 14 Points: 9,204, Level: 14 Points: 9,204, Level: 14
Activity: 3% Activity: 3% Activity: 3%
Re: Human testing with a untested RC?

The only thing that comes to mind would be perhaps waiting longer between doses to allow a better chance of returning to normality between trips.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 13-06-2008, 04:15
illuminati boy's Avatar
illuminati boy Gold member illuminati boy is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: 27-12-2005
Location: amerika's 51st state to the north
Posts: 180
illuminati boy must live here.illuminati boy must live here.illuminati boy must live here.illuminati boy must live here.illuminati boy must live here.illuminati boy must live here.illuminati boy must live here.illuminati boy must live here.
Points: 3,785, Level: 9 Points: 3,785, Level: 9 Points: 3,785, Level: 9
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Exclamation Re: Human testing with a untested RC?

Quote:
Originally Posted by fnord View Post
Grandma had a dream that she will soon be testing a compound that has no known human use,she understands that there will be risks invovled and wishes to minimise them.
Reading about Shulgin's protocols for testing substances would probably be a good starting point. He was extremely conservative at times when working up to an active dose. He was especially conservative when starting with a new class of compounds. In all honesty if there is no human data whatsoever it may not be out of the question to start sub microgram. Even if some Grandma had secondhand reports about rough dosing range, there is no way to know that they wouldn't have an idiosyncratic reaction (allergy, extreme sensitivity, etc.).

Quote:
Originally Posted by fnord View Post
...have it from one of the leading experts that the estimated dose is 2-6mg but the largest human test ive heard of is 1.5-2mg.
Grandmas should probably consider all data on extremely novel compounds to be suspect unless directly verified. Grandmas should also have the requisite knowledge(s) needed to engage in such an undertaking. At a minimum besides reading Shulgin's account prospective Grandmas should check out HERE and go through a risk/benefit analysis of such potential Grandmotherly endeavors.

IB

PS: Be EXTREMELY skeptical of all advice including even this.

Reputation Comments on this post:
  
  good advice
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How To Beat Drug Tests BA Drug testing 93 30-11-2009 20:53
Good information on passing a drug test Superball Drug testing 30 21-05-2009 20:03
Video Random drug testing in schools - good idea or abuse of human rights? ~lostgurl~ Miscellaneous News 13 07-06-2008 14:28
International - Human Rights in the Drug War: NGOs Slam UN Drug Bureaucracies, Demand Compliance With Alfa Drug Policy Reform & Narco Politics 0 15-03-2008 02:48
Pharma’s Human Testing Masks Death Injury transit Law and order 0 14-11-2005 05:12


Sitelinks: Site Functions:

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 15:47.


Copyright: Substance Information Network 2003 - 2009, All rights reserved