A comparison of contingency management and cognitive-behavioral approaches for stimulant-dependent individuals (2006) - Drugs Forum
Drugs-Forum  
News Groups Blog Forum Chat Video Audio Images Documents Wiki Home
Go Back   Drugs Forum > VARIOUS DRUG RELATED TOPICS > Recovery and addiction
Register Tags Mark Forums Read

Notices

Recovery and addiction Support for coping with addiction and kicking the habit.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 19-04-2008, 11:37
Jatelka's Avatar
Jatelka Jatelka is offline
Jatelka is back in a funk: The weekend aint so great!
Psychedelic Shepherdess
Moderator
 
Join Date: 16-10-2005
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 33
Posts: 5,025
Jatelka is a true resource and beyond reputeJatelka is a true resource and beyond reputeJatelka is a true resource and beyond reputeJatelka is a true resource and beyond reputeJatelka is a true resource and beyond reputeJatelka is a true resource and beyond reputeJatelka is a true resource and beyond reputeJatelka is a true resource and beyond reputeJatelka is a true resource and beyond reputeJatelka is a true resource and beyond reputeJatelka is a true resource and beyond repute
Points: 18,312, Level: 19 Points: 18,312, Level: 19 Points: 18,312, Level: 19
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
A comparison of contingency management and cognitive-behavioral approaches for stimulant-dependent individuals (2006)

A new entry has been added to Drugs Archive

Description:
Addiction 2006 Feb;101(2):267-74

Rawson RA, McCann MJ, Flammino F, Shoptaw S, Miotto K, Reiber C, Ling W.

AIMS: Previous research has reported that both contingency management (CM) and cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) are efficacious interventions for the treatment of stimulant abusers. The present study sought to directly compare the effectiveness of (CM) and (CBT) alone and in combination in reducing stimulant use. DESIGN: Randomized clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: Stimulant-dependent individuals (n = 171). INTERVENTION: CM, CBT or combined CM and CBT, 16-week treatment conditions. CM condition participants received vouchers for stimulant-free urine samples. CBT condition participants attended three 90-minute group sessions each week. MEASUREMENTS: Participants were interviewed at baseline and weeks 17, 26 and 52. Measures included psychiatric disorders and alcohol and drug use and concomitant social problems. FINDINGS: CM procedures produced better retention and lower rates of stimulant use during the study period. Self-reported stimulant use was reduced from baseline levels at all follow-up points for all groups and urinalysis data did not differ between groups at follow-up. While CM produced robust evidence of efficacy during treatment application, CBT produced comparable longer-term outcomes. There was no evidence of an additive effect when the two treatments were combined. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that CM is an efficacious treatment for reducing stimulant use and is superior during treatment to a CBT approach. CM is useful in engaging substance abusers, retaining them in treatment and helping them achieve abstinence from stimulant use. CBT also reduces drug use from baseline levels and produces comparable outcomes on all measures at follow-up

To check it out, rate it or add comments, visit A comparison of contingency management and cognitive-behavioral approaches for stimulant-dependent individuals (2006)
The comments you make there will appear in the posts below.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


Sitelinks: Site Functions:

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 21:18.


Copyright: Substance Information Network 2003 - 2009, All rights reserved