METRO MUST ACCEPT PRO-MARIJUANA ADS - Drugs Forum
Drugs-Forum  
News Groups Blog Forum Chat Video Audio Images Documents Wiki Home
Go Back   Drugs Forum > VARIOUS DRUG RELATED TOPICS > Drug News > Miscellaneous News
Register Tags Mark Forums Read

Notices

Miscellaneous News Miscellaneous News about drugs

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-02-2005, 19:11
Alfa's Avatar
Alfa Alfa is nu online
Alfa is temporary not available
Productive insomniac
Administrator
 
Join Date: 14-01-2003
Location: Netherlands
Age: 94
Posts: 20,155
Blog Entries: 2
Alfa is a true resource and beyond reputeAlfa is a true resource and beyond reputeAlfa is a true resource and beyond reputeAlfa is a true resource and beyond reputeAlfa is a true resource and beyond reputeAlfa is a true resource and beyond reputeAlfa is a true resource and beyond reputeAlfa is a true resource and beyond reputeAlfa is a true resource and beyond reputeAlfa is a true resource and beyond reputeAlfa is a true resource and beyond repute
Points: 118,914, Level: 49 Points: 118,914, Level: 49 Points: 118,914, Level: 49
Activity: 99% Activity: 99% Activity: 99%
METRO MUST ACCEPT PRO-MARIJUANA ADS

Metro officials must accept advertising that promotes the legalization of
marijuana now that the Justice Department has opted not to defend the
transit agency's ban on such ads.

Justice officials had until Wednesday to appeal a federal court decision
that struck down a law recently passed in Congress stating that transit
agencies would lose federal funding if they accepted ads advocating the
legalization or medical use of such illicit drugs.

Metro has yet to receive pro-marijuana ads since the Justice Department's
decision, but a spokesman said the agency would not reject such ads unless
they "showcased profanity."

"The transit agency is not in the business of picking and choosing what can
and cannot go up," Metro spokesman Steven Taubenkibel said.

The government "does not have a viable argument to advance in the statute's
defense," acting Solicitor General Paul D. Clement said in a letter to
Senate attorneys last month that explained his decision.

He said the law also could have banned transit agencies from posting ads
with anti-drug messages and other public service announcements.

U.S. Rep. Ernest Istook, Oklahoma Republican, pushed for the law last year
after Metro ran a series of ads by Change the Climate Inc., a Boston group
that promotes the legalization of marijuana.

One ad touting marijuana legalization showed a young couple embracing, with
the caption "Enjoy Better Sex!"

Mr. Istook had no comment Wednesday on the Justice Department's decision, a
spokeswoman said.

D.C. Council member Jim Graham, who serves on the board of directors for
Metro, said he agreed with the Justice Department's decision, though he did
not care for the marijuana ads.

"I think that any decision that favors the First Amendment right to freedom
of expression is a good one," said Mr. Graham, Ward 1 Democrat. "Some of
these ads are hard to swallow, but what we're talking about is freedom of
expression. And sometimes we just have to gulp."

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) sued the federal government last
year when Metro rejected a Change the Climate ad with the headline
"Marijuana Laws Waste Billions of Taxpayer Dollars to Lock Up Non-Violent
Americans."

Metro officials cited the new federal law when rejecting the ad, saying the
cash-strapped agency could not risk losing $170 million in federal subsidies.

Joseph White, executive director for Change the Climate, said the group has
not ruled out another round of pro-marijuana ads for the Metro system.

"I expect that we will be launching a campaign when we decide where that
would be most effective," he said. "It's a little too early to say right now."

ACLU officials were surprised yesterday but lauded the Justice Department's
decision.

"It's very unusual," said Graham Boyd, director of the group's drug law
reform project. "I think it is a surprisingly frank admission that the
First Amendment requires an evenhanded treatment."

Anti-drug advocates were disappointed by the decision not to defend the case.

"It's very distressing news that it appears we're not fighting back on
this," said Joyce Nalepka, president of the District-based Drug-Free Kids.
"Washington, D.C., really needs to make a statement. There must be a way to
stop these ads."
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Interesting scholarly drug facts rxbandit Pharmacology 17 30-10-2008 06:53
Drug info - Cannabis Myths and Facts vantranist Cannabis using 8 22-07-2008 07:27
Marinol vs. Marijuana: Politics, Science, and Popular Culture Alfa Cannabis 1 27-12-2006 00:09
The Untold Story grecian Cannabis using 3 10-10-2006 23:13
How and Where Young Adults Obtain Marijuana Lunar Loops Miscellaneous News 0 26-05-2006 16:26


Sitelinks: Site Functions:

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:03.


Copyright: Substance Information Network 2003 - 2009, All rights reserved