|
| News Groups Blog Forum Chat Video Audio Images Documents Wiki Home |
|
|||||||
| Register | Tags | FAQ n Rules | Mark Forums Read |
| Notices |
| Miscellaneous News Miscellaneous News about drugs |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Us: "pot 2.0" Is More Potent
I believe weed's a lot stronger than it was in the 60's. Like mentioned in the article, it's the market. In the 50's and 60's, weed wasn't really viewed as a money maker like today, but it's durring the 60's when things changed. People wanted something between lsd and weed, and so they just made stronger weed. Stronger weed=more money. Every market changed durring the 70's, and people got greedy. I'm starting to ramble now, but in it's simplest: Weed is obviously more stronger (exact numbers unkown) than before it was popularized.
|
|
#4
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
Re: Us: "pot 2.0" Is More Potent
There's no way in hell
![]() 20% I could imagine but 30+ is nuts |
|
#7
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
Re: Us: "pot 2.0" Is More Potent
white widow doesn't usually have a high percentage of thc. The reason people freak on white widow so much is because of the white hairs, which they dont understand its not THC its just hairs. Most people that just have read on the internet or heard Widow is the best. When in actuality its not even in the top 5.Most cannabis in california from medical clubs ranges from 10-25%to get 30% thc, one must get lucky and most likely is the direct grower. Its almost unheard of. Herojuana, Chem, Pure Kush, are some of the highest thc producing buds. Usually getting above 25% but never up to 35%. Also, SWIM has been to other parts of this country and practically every state has bad bud. Unless one is in California,Washington,Oregon,Parts of Canada, NYC, Switzerland,South Africa, Or the Netherlands they usually aren't getting good dank. They might think its good, but usually is not flushed right, cured, or is very chemmy bud. This study is propaganda, but hey everything in this world is now and days. Just turn on the Tv.
|
|
#8
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
Re: Us: "pot 2.0" Is More Potent
I love buzz words.
NEWS FLASH "AJAX FOR POT, thats right folks in the new fangled future they'll be able to send information STRAIGHT to your pot with out you even noticing a difference! Read drugs-forum news while you smoke it(both the news and the 'pot 2.0')! Some scientists are also working on implementing CSS2 so that drug dealers can make their pot look unique or 'psychedelic' it will be like 'purple sticky' without the wrapping!!!" |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Us: "pot 2.0" Is More Potent
But what are the hairs then? Swim always believed that the hairs seemed to be the hallucenogenic part of a plant, while the crystals give that stoning high.
|
|
#10
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
Re: Us: "pot 2.0" Is More Potent
They're saying 8.5% THC is high? Isn't Feminised white widow meant to be just under 19%? They're complaining that crap weed is too strong!
|
|
#11
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
Re: Us: "pot 2.0" Is More Potent
Swim is Dutch and had his super skunk or strong canabis, etc.. He didn't smoke that much because it knocked him out ! Never went to hospital/phoned ambulance for any drug related problems.
|
|
#12
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
Re: Us: "pot 2.0" Is More Potent
it seems to swim more potent pot would be less harmful, as in it takes less inhaled smoke to reach the desired effects, so itd be better on ones lungs. swim and friends smoke until they reach the desired 'highness' then stop, why would people smoke so much and to the point of having an unpleasant eperience, the only ones swim could imagine doing this are newbies.
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| marijuana potency, marijuana potency project |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
| Sitelinks: | Site Functions: |