Swim was surfing around a bit and was thinking about caffeine analogues. And he found lots of them. Swim is a bit curious, because he never cam across this.
Swim found a potential one, which seems to be caffeine without the jitters, reading the description. Because it lacks psychomotor-stimulant properties, but it had the same behavioral effects. Or do I understand that wrong? But swim is not a biologist, so would someone comment on this?
Quote:
Psychomotor-stimulant effects of 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine: comparison with caffeine and 7-(2-chloroethyl) theophylline.
The behavioral effects of 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine (IBMX) were compared with those of caffeine and 7-(2-chloroethyl) theophylline (7-CET) in squirrel monkeys under a multiple schedule of reinforcement in which fixed-interval responding was maintained alternately by presentation of food and presentation of electric shock. All three drugs produced dose-related increases in response rate in both components of the multiple schedule. Thus, although IBMX generally lacks psychomotor-stimulant effects in rodents, it had behavioral effects in squirrel monkeys that were qualitatively similar to those of caffeine. Based on the average ED50 values, IBMX was 5-7 times more potent than caffeine and 7-CET was twice as potent as caffeine in the two schedule components. This potency relation corresponds well with those observed in radioligand binding assays for central adenosine receptors and is consistent with the view that the psychomotor-stimulant effects of methylxanthines are linked to their antagonistic actions at the adenosine-receptor level. There was no obvious correspondence between the capacity of the methylxanthines to increase response rate and their capacity to inhibit phosphodiesterase activity.
|
21-10-2007, 05:28
Hybrid Mode
