|
| News Groups Blog Forum Chat Video Audio Images Documents Wiki Home |
|
|||||||
| Register | Tags | FAQ n Rules | Mark Forums Read |
| Notices |
| Research Chemicals Piperazines, Phenethylamines, Tryptamines & other Research Chemicals or designer drugs. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
When starting a drug info thread, please use the following format for the first post:
Quote:
Quote:
The research chemical forums will undergo quite some cleaning and improving in the coming time. I need your input to decide on some things for the structure of the research chemical forums and their functions. For starters I'd like to know this: Every research chemical discussed should at least have two threads: - a 'experiences' thread - a 'drug info' thread What information should a experiences thread at least contain? So far I have come up with:
Last edited by Alfa; 20-08-2009 at 01:15. |
|
#2
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
Re: research chemical forum protocol & structure. Your input please.
you could add - 'abuse potenial/tolarance' to the 'experience thread'
the effects could be split in 3/4 parts - positive,negative,neutral,life changing? |
|
#3
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
Re: research chemical forum protocol & structure. Your input please.
for the experience thread, you may add :
. closed eyes visuals
_________________________________________. psychologicaly addictive For the drug info thread, maybe add
|
|
#4
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
Re: research chemical forum protocol & structure. Your input please.
I would suggest perhaps three threads:
experiences general info effects and ratings survey, ongoing, like what illuminati_boy did back in the day |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: research chemical forum protocol & structure. Your input please.
I have added weight and gender to experience threads and I have updated the OP with the suggestions of Dr.Ace and Joachimist.
Chris; you know what I am up to... |
|
#6
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
Re: research chemical forum protocol & structure. Your input please.
Do keep in mind the chemistry regards it's (the RC in question) relatives. eg: phenethylamine (mescaline derivative), tryptamine (indole-class), or piperazine structure.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: help df by making molecular structures for research chemicals
Alfa,
If there is not a info-dedicated drug for a particular drug, should this be added with an OP similar to: Quote:
And add the molecule along with it? What about the pihkal/tihkal entry. I know you have said all of the entries of books 2 were in on D-F, but I don't see them all. Like, 2c-t-2 and 2c-t-7, I can't find info dedicated threads or the pihkal entries for these. Also, I have noticed that many of the threads you start that I think are dedicated for info, are sometimes simply just the pihkal/tihkal entry and sometimes the post is as given as above. I guess I am just curious as to how you are wanting drug information organized with regards to us inserting the molecules in specific threads and what these threads are and if they are to contain the pihkal/tihkal entry? Last edited by Alfa; 19-10-2007 at 16:44. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: help df by making molecular structures for research chemicals
That's 100% correct: Each substance should have a 'drug info' thread and a 'experiences' thread. The OP of the drug info thread should ideally contain the above information, pihkal/ tihkal entry and molecule. Feel free to add threads. Please select the appropriate thread prefix.
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: help df by making molecular structures for research chemicals
Note that when creating experience threads, include a similar text as this:
Quote:
Last edited by Alfa; 27-10-2007 at 08:12. |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: help df by making molecular structures for research chemicals
Should we focus the experience thread such that it says we only want true experience reports (i.e. not in combination)?
Here is what I have put in the OP on my EIPT experiences thread: Quote:
Last edited by Alfa; 27-10-2007 at 08:13. |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: research chemical forum protocol & structure. Your input please.
On threads like this:
Drug info - 2c-c where drug info threads have been created by you with just the pihkal entry, I think something like this: Quote:
EDIT: Can an admin or mod please add the "experiences" prefix to the phenethylamines forum please. Last edited by Alfa; 19-10-2007 at 16:45. |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: research chemical forum protocol & structure. Your input please.
Yes, that would be helpful.
I added a experiences prefix. I also added the following text to the drug info standard text: Quote:
as this includes a search in the file archive on the word "2C-T-7". But if it is not clear to you how to do this, then never mind. Last edited by Alfa; 19-10-2007 at 09:30. |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: research chemical forum protocol & structure. Your input please.
Quote:
|
|
#17
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
Re: research chemical forum protocol & structure. Your input please.
Should the "info" thread include an explicit questionnaire (maybe even a poll) that mimics Illuminati Boy's RC Evaluation questionnaires of last year? The continued gathering of that information might be of interest to someone who wishes to collate and interpret it in the future.
|
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: research chemical forum protocol & structure. Your input please.
Are you psychic?
![]() BTW: it would also be a good idea, if those of you that have knowledge of the stability of compounds, would comment on this in the drug info threads. Unstable compounds may degrade fast / slow and may even degrade to illegal or toxic compounds. Therefore this is relevant information for the 'drug info' threads. I have added this for drug info threads: Quote:
trptamene: Using the syntaxt "the following documents about this substance are in the file archive: none yet" makes no sense when there are documents. Maybe it's best to use: Last edited by Alfa; 19-10-2007 at 16:45. |
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: research chemical forum protocol & structure. Your input please.
Quote:
For chemicals that do have files in the archive, should I link every file in this type of fashion: the following documents about this substance are in the file archive: EU Risk Assessment of 2C-T-7, Hallucinogen-Like Actions of 2C-T-7 in Mice an Rats (Fantegrossi et al, 2004) .... Or simply just link the search in the manner you said? Also, does this mean updating this post whenever an article that fits the RC is added. This is no problem, but seems like it might take a long time, but I guess if one were to just go through and do this monthly it might not be too bad. |
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: research chemical forum protocol & structure. Your input please.
just the search link will do. This way we will not need to update the post with every new file.
|
|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: research chemical forum protocol & structure. Your input please.
To avoid confusion over dosage and accidental intake of extreme doses, please put the example listing of dosage, route and duration in the experience threads in quotes like this:
Quote:
|
|
#22
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
Re: research chemical forum protocol & structure. Your input please.
The links to the documents in the archive should all be identical to the one below, with only the name of the research chemical contained in the link changed: http://www.drugs-forum.com/forum/local_links_search.php?action=show&search=ethylone&keys=1&searchdate=0
Once you have the correct link you can rename it "File Archive Documents about [insert drug here]" Or whatever phrase you decide to use, as long as it is the same for all substances. The above phrase fits in with the current links for video & audio that are found in forum headers, so I personally think it is the best choice. Note: The red is just to highlight the word that needs to replaced. |
|
#24
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
Quote:
2C-E deserves allot of respect and if you don't it will kick you in the arse lol don't think my pet monkey henry will venture into that realm of 'psycadelicness' for a long time., if ever again heavy duty shit! |
|
#25
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: research chemical forum protocol & structure. Your input please.
Alfa:
In the pihkal/tihkal entries for the drug info dedicated threads I noticed you are not including the synthetic part. I realize the synthesis says nothing about the chemical other than how to get to it, but are threads containing these entries supposed to be drugs-forum archive of these books? If this is mean to be our archive of this work then the synthesis should probably be included. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
| Sitelinks: | Site Functions: |