Coincidence Or Conspiracy

[Woodman]

You be the judge.

I think this goof looks like Father Tucker, the Child-Fucker.


http://www.apocalypsecartoons.com/do.../wp/tucker.bmp

http://www.apocalypsecartoons.com/fa...hertucker.html

http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599...36-401,00.html

...okay, maybe it's a stretch, but close enough, eh?

Reputation Comments on this post:

total ignorance.

[Harry]

Well, I will go for coincidence.

Also, there is a HUGE difference between gay solicitation of one adult to another and that of pedophilia. And the actual implying you are doing here...is well, kinda sorta, sad.

If ya want to laugh at this dude for his actions, go ahead, it seems he may have brought it on himself. But to connect potential gay behaviour with pedophilia is absurd.

I rate you post, ignorant.

(and I am not a gay man!)

Reputation Comments on this post:

Presumptuous idiocy.

[Woodman]

Any idiot can discern that not all homosexuals are pedophiles.

I consider soliciting anonymous man-on-man action in a public restroom to be just as sleazy as pedophelia.

I rate YOUR post, ignorant by a factor of 10 for throwing out false indignation, and for downplaying the fact that there actually DOES exist a genuine connection between gay behavior and pedophelia. In fact, it would be truly absurd to DENY any link between the interests of homosexual political activists, and those of pedophiles.

If your statement was correct, then why are homosexual activist organizations be trying so hard to bend the law in order to get access to little boys?

http://www.manhattan-institute.org/h...out_battle.htm

...and don't come back with some bullshit about how "civic-minded" they are because I DON'T see them rushing out to volunteer at senior health-care centers to assist old people, or rehabilitation hospitals for the disabled to assist the crippled & infirm.

...but, the Boy Scouts, with all those smooth-skinned young boys to "mentor", YUUUUMMMMM!!!

Apparently, this is an organization that homosexuals want very badly to get into.
Gee, I wonder, why?

http://www.nambla.org/welcome.htm

"NAMBLA's goal is to end the extreme oppression of men and boys in mutually consensual relationships by:

-cooperating with lesbian, gay, feminist, and other liberation movements"

I think you could make a better argument that there is no link between Islam and terrorism.

[Harry]

Would the original post exist if he was arrested for solicitating a female prostitute? I doubt very much it would.

And I don't need your education on the matter. I work daily in fighting to keep pedophiles away from kids, hand in hand with every form of law agency there is. And guess what, gay males help us catch them too.

You sir, know little of what you speak and come off as a ignorant homophobe.

Nice job linking Nambla, by the way.

[Woodman]

LMAO!!!

I wondered just how long it would be before some factless idiot resorted to name-calling.

"Racist, Bigot, Sexist, Homophobe, etc.".

I really think that you need to temper your thoughtless adherence to Political Correctness with a healthy degree of intelligence.

It astounds me to see the sheep-people of the left afraid to acknowledge the truth when ever it puts their Liberal political agenda in a bad light.

[Harry]

Would you like me to fill this thread with facts for you? Your presumption of linking 'sex crime' to pedophilia is unfounded. If you want to turn this thread into a debate about the prevalence of pedophiles and their tendancies I am more then happy to. And I will.

I would recommend a mod. come in and have a look around first and give the go ahead, because frankly, I am here for the drug conversation, and I think making links to nambla and such is never a good thing, regardless of the premise.

[Woodman]

Harry,


I thought the whole fucking thing was as funny as hell.

YOU are the one who seems to want to turn this thread into a “debate”.

I STILL think it’s funny because now everyone can watch as you exercise some fucked-up compulsion to exhibit self-righteous indignation. And while I can only imagine that it is probably because I made statements that conflict with dogma you maintain on this “sacred-cow” issue, it makes it all the more hilarious as you bounce from post-to-post looking down your nose, pontificating, trying to tell me how wrong I am.

By all means, call a mod, but I think that you are likely to get cited for shitting in my thread. So, the next time you feel the need to show people how important you are by taking an off-handed soft thread and attempt to use it as exhibition grounds to display your socio-political piety, do it in someone else's thread, or at least try to maintain a respectable measure of intellectual fortitude if you are determined to do it in one of mine.

Originally Posted by Harry

Your presumption of linking 'sex crime' to pedophilia is unfounded.

Have you even been following my posts?

I’ve already made the links. It’s there for everyone to see and read.

WTF have YOU been reading?

[Harry]

Linking a few pedo examples associated with homosexual tendancies does not imply you have any knowledge regarding pedophilia. Doing so and going 'aha!" kind of exhibits how little you actually do know.

I will make an assumption that you are a white male, between the ages of 18-80. Is this a fair assumption? I will assume yes. Do you prefer females? I will again assume yes. You my friend, and your demographic are far more likely to commit the next pedophile act that is about to happen, and so am I, and so is every other while male by far and large, then any other demographic, including homosexuals.

Do they align themselves in institutions, jobs, organizations to be close to children, Boy Scouts etc as you imply, well yes they do. Do you know the number one occupation
pedophiles have, convicted registered sex offenders? Teachers, by far and large. Usually preying on young girls.

OMGZORS, all teachers must be pedophiles!!!

I find it sort of funny also, when people draw conclusions based on very limited information and their own biased beliefs.

Hey, I watch the news too, I think the guy is a goof too. I just don't feel making the leap to pedophilia based on homosexual behaviour is a good leap. It reeks to me of anti-gay propaganda.

Anyway, carry on sir.

[Woodman]

Harry,


Do I REALLY have to SAY that you are wrong on most of those assumptions?

The fun-factor of this thread is waning, so either pick it up or go find another soapbox.

[allyourbase]

pedophilia = sex crime
gay "love in's" on the interstate = sex crime
Bea Arthur = Criminally Sexy.

Oh Bea, none can love you as I!!!!!

[Nature Boy]

Originally Posted by Woodman

I think this goof looks like Father Tucker, the Child-Fucker.

I concur. Although to me he looks more like Charlie Chester, child molester.

[fnord]

Bea Arthur = Criminally Sexy


whats the opposite of pedophilia? geriaphilia?

hehe my spell check wants to turn geriaphilia into necrophilia..

[Woodman]

Originally Posted by fnord

Bea Arthur = Criminally Sexy

Oh, now that is just SICK!!!!

The suggestion, alone, is enough to induce impotence.