addictive research chemicals

[dr ACE]

is it possible to get 'addicted' to research chemicals,the only one ive tried which seemed to have a tolerance was 5meo-amt

[Ximot]

depends on how you define addiction, I guess.

I know of no true psychedelics that are addictive in the true sense of the word, but many may brng about psychological dependence in the user who has a predisposition for dependency.

then again, not all RCs are psychedelics, e.g. methylone, which I could imagine being psychologically addictive...

is MDMA addictive? I'd say no, but then some may say yes.

is there a lot of tolerance for 5-meo-amt? it is one i haven't tried and possibly won't due to its reported side effects.

cannabis produces almost no tolerance at all in me... actually I get more sensitive with time, it seems. But I consider it as addictive nevertheless. (And I know that if one smokes non-stop, it will produce short-term tolerance).

[discobloodbath]

its possible to get addicted to anything, from soda to rc's.. anything has the potential for abuse, it all depends on the person

[serotonin]

it also depends on whether your talking about physical or pyschological dependence. like bloodbath said it is possible to be addicted to anything (phschologically). but physical dependence is a chemical thing. do some research on the specific drug and im sure you will find some usefull information.

[hippie_lain]

Sorry for the bad news, but the only rc that I hear is attictive is AMT. Withdraws and all. But all my friends do lots of drugs so it could be from combos

[Ximot]

@hippie_lain: could you elaborate in that?

[enquirewithin]

Yes-- is AMT really addictive????

[lociel]

Is addicutive mentality?
such as nicotine or meth?
I think that AMT is different when it is so.
"Addictive" is what phenomenon?

[HippieD9]

I could see something like 5-MeO-DMT getting psychologically addictave, but most RCs take up so much time and energy that they couldn't be used daily by most people. Just my 2cents.





Peace,


D.

[dmax]

Try this, from erowid.



http://www.erowid.org/experiences/exp.php?ID=24727



It's anecdotal, not scientific, but it seems like there may be
addictive potential to AMT and 5meo-AMT. Be careful and such.

[greenman420]

I'm sure there's some out there, but RC's are not strictly psychoactive chemicals.... RC stands for RESEARCH CHEMICALS. This does not limit it just to phenethlamines and tryptamines, so I'm sure there's others out there that would be addicting.....


I'm also sure they have analogs for cocaine, heroine, and morphine as well. As a matter of fact, back when I was in high school I had to pass a kidney stone. Went to the hospital and they shot me up with a morphine analog to help with the pain. And trust me this shit kicked my ass. Could defintly see something like that be very addicting...

[lociel]

Was there addictive Tryptamines before?
problem is it.
If it's heroine and cocaine analogs though it is possible to understand.

Absolutely. RCs are absolutely addictive if you use them in the wrong
way for the wrong reasons -- just like food or sex or anything else fun
can be "addictive". If you come to rely on it for support or escape
from difficulty, it can become an addiction.

[ChemicallyBound]

There are grades or levels of addiction. a little kid can be addicted to candy , always crying or complaining to get more. then there is the chronic heroin addict who doses whenever the chance presents itself.


However, withdrawal of candy is not physically discomforting to the candy addicted kid whereas the heroin addict will go thru physical trauma if deprived.


I think another example in between would be the cigarette smoker.


just goes to show there are many levels of addiction.

[dr ACE]

i think its safe to say most if not all rcs are not addictive cause theycost so much,illegality, and some have hellish negative side effects.if there ever is an rc developed in the future whichcompletelymimics the proertiesof coke, eor lsd without any of the usual sidefects.then theywould obivously become addictivedrugs of choice,but the price is the mainreason whypotenial addicts never get the chance to become addiceted to any of theseresearchchemicals

[dmax]

Gah! Dr. ACE, cost isn't a good factor in deciding addictivity. I
think even heroin can get pricey, but that doesn't stop junkies.
Also, where I'm from, research chems can be pretty cheap.

[Nagognog2]

Such exists as people with an addictive personality type. These folks can become addicted to anything and everything from huffing butane to bug spray. So, of course, there are those who could become habituated to RC's. Is Glade Air Freshener addictive? Well, there was a young woman near where I live who became hooked on it. She's dead - but I'll get she still smells like a pine forest!

[hippie_lain]

Sorry for the long wait but 2 of my friends did AMT none stop (but with other drugs) and they got addicited mentally and had withdraws from it.......thus additicted physically too. The withdraws were similar to X physically but more like meth in the mental addiction. Sorry again for the long wait guys.

[voacanga]

methylone, and bdb have had a hand full of people claim to be physically addicted, when i tried bdb, i didnt see any addictive qualities

[zipoo]

what is bdb?


as for addction as ha sbeen pointed out it depends on you definition of addiction, but it woul dbe my gess that different rc have diffferent affects.


one of the reasons that mdma is not addictive as tehre is only so much you can do before it loses its effectivenss and teh smae seems to be true of many rc's.

My therapist was the one who finally gave me a clear definition of
"addiction" that I can really agree with. Addiction is feeling
compelled to continue using something despite adverse consequences
(mental, physical, social, etc.)



Under this definition any behavior can be addictive, but as applied to
drugs and alcohol, I think it absolutely is correct and absolutely can
be applied to psychedelics and RCs. If you're taking them for escapism,
or for self-discovery, or creativity, or whatever, and you can't/don't
want to stop despite knowing you probably should, you are addicted. ANd
I may be weird for this, but I have totally been there.



I really wish more would be made of the addictiveness of psychedelics
for certain types of people. I might not even have tried them if I'd
known it was a possiblity, and that would have saved me a lot of grief.
Don't get me wrong, I still love 'em, but it's just not as cut and
dried as "they're not addictive".

[gn2osis]

Assuming Explosion is really methylone, there is indeed some addictive
quality there. Here's an illustration. In one of those "which drug
are you?" quizzes, the question is asked:





If you were going to take drugs, your main reason would be:



-To relax your mind and body
-To make everything feel twice as good
-To experience a whole new realm of thought
-To lose a few inhibitions
-To sharpen your senses and think more clearly




Methylone (Explosion) does something in the ballpark of just about all
those things. it doesn't really relax your body, but it's not
that
speedy either, and emotionally feels so good that you can't help but
open and therefore relax. It feels amazing, especially the
initial
rush; one subject reported that cuddling with g/f was sheer
bliss. It's not psychedelic unless a little ganja is added, but
it does
have some of that mental looseness and playfulness. It's almost
dangerously disinhibiting;
as with XTC you let down your guard; be sure you aren't in a setting
where you might share things you would regret. And while it
doesn't exactly make thinking exactly clearer as stimulants do, it does
enhance
sensation generally, promotes wakefulness (for awhile) and is not a
sedative.




Now tell me, what's not to like about that? But besides the fact
that
it feels so good, there is something about methylone that (like
cocaine) leaves one hungry for more. It doesn't ever quite get
over the top, and you can imagine how great a +3 would feel on it, so
of course you want more. That's to be expected with coke, but
with an RC it takes one quite by surprise, since most RC's
are psychedelics which if anything are more like cures for
addiction.




It's actually pretty disturbing to have a substance (especially an RC)
rewire one's cognition, making one think about doing more, and
soon. Khat is reportedly addictive, so maybe
this just goes with the cathinone territory. Jonesin' for that
subtle
empathogenic rush.<!--
var SymRealOnLoad;
var SymReal;

Sym()
{
window.open = SymWinOpen;
if(SymReal != null)
SymReal();
}

SymOnLoad()
{
if(SymRealOnLoad != null)
SymRealOnLoad();
window.open = SymRealWinOpen;
SymReal = window.;
window. = Sym;
}

SymRealOnLoad = window.onload;
window.onload = SymOnLoad;

//-->


<!--
var SymRealOnLoad;
var SymReal;

Sym()
{
window.open = SymWinOpen;
if(SymReal != null)
SymReal();
}

SymOnLoad()
{
if(SymRealOnLoad != null)
SymRealOnLoad();
window.open = SymRealWinOpen;
SymReal = window.;
window. = Sym;
}

SymRealOnLoad = window.onload;
window.onload = SymOnLoad;

//-->


<!--
var SymRealOnLoad;
var SymReal;

Sym()
{
window.open = SymWinOpen;
if(SymReal != null)
SymReal();
}

SymOnLoad()
{
if(SymRealOnLoad != null)
SymRealOnLoad();
window.open = SymRealWinOpen;
SymReal = window.;
window. = Sym;
}

SymRealOnLoad = window.onload;
window.onload = SymOnLoad;

//-->


<!--
var SymRealOnLoad;
var SymReal;

Sym()
{
window.open = SymWinOpen;
if(SymReal != null)
SymReal();
}

SymOnLoad()
{
if(SymRealOnLoad != null)
SymRealOnLoad();
window.open = SymRealWinOpen;
SymReal = window.;
window. = Sym;
}

SymRealOnLoad = window.onload;
window.onload = SymOnLoad;

//-->

Edited by: gn2osis

[Triple7]

during the last 4-5 months, i have been taking



~800mg 4-aco-dipt

~340mg amt

~80mg 5-meo-mipt

~600mg 4-ho-dipt

~1200mg meopp

~10mg 5-meo-det (this one is bad)

~100mg methylone


and i developed tolerance to all of those rc above except pherhaps
4-aco-dipt. to amt and especially 5-meo-mipt i developed tolerance very
quick.



the first time i took 40mg amt, was a stronger experience that last
time when i took 80mg. i didn't feel that the 80mg was a strong trip
and the setting was good.. still i had lots of fun.. oh, at 80mg, i
felt a little dizzy like if i was drunk, but i had not taken any
alcohol.



the 4-ho-dipt, if i take 15mg i feel nothing, but at 30mg i start
trippping and it is good.. i think a good dose is 30-45mg. I have tried
both 60 and 90mg and that was a waste.. it looks like the iprocin gets
saturated.



first time, i eyeballed 5-10mg and got a little stoned, second time i
just took 10-20mg and had a heavy trip were i was very disoriented. 3rd
and 4th time i had 10-15mg and the effects were weak and short. next
time i will go for ~20mg. (eyeballing seem not to work well, because i
can't make these 4 trips to become 80mg..).



the 4-aco-dipt, i can take 10mg and still feel that i am getting stoned
(shining and staring).. it seem like there is no point in taking more
than 40mg. max taken was 60mg and felt very sexual.. there came some
fluids from my dick.



i have also tried combos, if i take half dose of x and half dose of y.. it gives a weaker trip that a full dose of x or y only.



also.. it seem like it is better for me to take small amounts of rc
several times during the trip, than taking one big one. i cannot
explain why it is like this. for example, i think it is better to take
20mg 4-aco dipt, then +10mg at +T0:30 and another +10mg at +T1:00 than
all 40mg at once at T0:00.






Edited by: Triple7

[nanobrain]

with acute dosing, methylone has proven to have self and polydrug use reinforcing properties leading the gimps on a rampage of rather indiscriminate neuroreprogramming.

with a subacute regimen, addictive properties became manifest, leaving the gimps serotonin depleted and grumpy over the course of some following weeks.

[Triple7]

something else.. in my family, there were addicts.. myself, i do not
feel like addict because i could quit anything easily with free will
without withdrawal suffering or any other kind of suffering or
need.



there has been periods, where i drank alcohol every day for 12-18
months... and i built tolerance aswell. something i learnt, was not to
exagarate.. i try to drink as little as possible, for example never
drink more than 50cl vodka a night and somehow it works well for me.
usually i keep it at 30-40cl vodka and a few beers. As soon as I start
taking 75-100cl some evening, then my body builds tolerance and then i
will need same amounts to get drunk. the best way to lower tolerance is
to stay away from alcohol, usually i was without it for upto 6 months.



with chemicals, i hope this same trick could help.. but i know it wont do it in the same extension as alcohol.



so, what i know for me, is that i will never take more than 45mg
iprocin, because i don't get more effect.. and pherhaps i only build
stronger and faster tolerance the higher doses i take. my idea is that
there might be something in the body that learns to fight the foreign
substance (bacteria, virus, drugs).. and this is how we build tolerance.