Pot 2.0 - More like Bullshit Propoganda 2.0 - Drugs Forum
Drugs-Forum  
News Groups Blog Forum Chat Video Audio Images Documents Wiki Home
Go Back   Drugs Forum > VARIOUS DRUG RELATED TOPICS > Drug News > Miscellaneous News
Register Tags Mark Forums Read

Notices

Miscellaneous News Miscellaneous News about drugs

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-05-2007, 23:35
zera's Avatar
zera Gold member zera is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: 11-09-2006
Location: Returning some videotapes...
Age: 23
Posts: 800
zera must think in IUPACzera must think in IUPACzera must think in IUPACzera must think in IUPACzera must think in IUPACzera must think in IUPACzera must think in IUPACzera must think in IUPACzera must think in IUPACzera must think in IUPACzera must think in IUPAC
Points: 4,979, Level: 10 Points: 4,979, Level: 10 Points: 4,979, Level: 10
Activity: 1% Activity: 1% Activity: 1%
Pot 2.0 - More like Bullshit Propoganda 2.0

Two peices from the reason blog below, the latest argument against marijuana is that its super-potent, well oops, looks like thats moot because the stronger the pot the less people smoke. Turns out the strong weed that happens to be described as cocaine-like is actually healthier because you consume less combustibles.

Heres the first peice

'This Is Pot 2.0'

Jacob Sullum | May 2, 2007, 1:49pm
Federal drug warriors are citing the latest numbers from the University of Mississippi's Marijuana Potency Project to bolster their argument that smoking pot is a far more serious matter today than it used to be. The numbers, based on analyses of seized cannabis, indicate that average THC potency increased from around 4 percent in 1983 to 8.5 percent in 2006. As The Drug War Chronicle'sScott Morgan notes, this increase is a far cry from drug czar John Walters' 2002 claim that "the potency of available marijuana has not merely 'doubled,' but increased as much as 30 times"—a ratio that could not possibly hold true unless you were comparing the most potent marijuana money can buy to nonpsychoactive ditchweed. But never mind. "Researchers and treatment experts have argued for some time that today's more powerful marijuana has more harmful effects on users," says Walters. "This report underscores that we are no longer talking about the drug of the 1960s and 1970s—this is Pot 2.0."
Norah Volkow, director of the National Institute on Drug Abuse, notes that the market is giving people what they want: "Like in the market you favor the best tomatoes. When people buy marijuana, they don't want a weak cigarette."
The argument that better pot is worse pot has never made much sense to me. There's essentially no risk of a toxic THC dose; the main health hazard from smoking pot comes from inhaling the combustion products. Smoking less of the good stuff (which is what people tend to do) is, if anything, less hazardous than smoking more of the weak stuff. These warnings have to be understood mainly as a rationalization for the hypocrisy of parents (and politicians) who smoked pot in their youth and thought it was no big deal then but feel a need to explain why it is a big deal now.
http://www.reason.com/blog/show/119974.html


Second peice

4/20 Message: Stop Smoking Pot!

Jacob Sullum | April 20, 2007, 1:00pm
A new study confirms that vaporization, which involves heating marijuana to release cannabinoids without burning it, "is a safe and effective mode of delivery of THC." California researchers randomly assigned 18 healthy subjects to inhale vapor from a xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx brand vaporizer loaded with marijuana of different potencies (1.7, 3.4, and 6.8 percent THC). As expected, the subjects inhaled less vapor from the stronger pot, more from the weaker pot, achieving similar THC blood levels regardless of the cannabis they received. NORML News reports that the subjects absorbed, on average, 54 percent of the released THC, compared to the 20 percent or so typical of smokers, while avoiding the toxins generated by combustion. Health and comfort considerations aside, this marijuana-conserving difference could easily justify the investment in a vaporizer for regular users. The Volcano retails for $540 or so, and there are cheaper competing products, although I don't think Consumer Reports has gotten around to rating them.
In short, vaporization is an appealing alternative for patients (or recreational users) who want the quick action and dose control of smoking without the smoke. Oddly, this option was overlooked in the 1999 National Academy of Sciences report on medical marijuana that called for the development of smoke-free cannabinoid delivery methods, although vaporizers were commercially available at the time. And no, I don't own any stock in Storz & Bickel, the Volcano's manufacturer, although I wish I did.

Reputation Comments on this post:
  
  great find.
  
  Ya didn't check the links in yer articles - please remove the Volcano link (commercial)

Last edited by Nagognog2; 03-05-2007 at 19:07.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-05-2007, 17:56
Beeker's Avatar
Beeker Iridium member Beeker is offline
Iridium Member
 
Join Date: 08-01-2006
Location: Americas
Age: 36
Posts: 645
Beeker probably knows what they are talking about.Beeker probably knows what they are talking about.Beeker probably knows what they are talking about.Beeker probably knows what they are talking about.Beeker probably knows what they are talking about.
Points: 2,853, Level: 8 Points: 2,853, Level: 8 Points: 2,853, Level: 8
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Re: Pot 2.0 - More like Bullshit Propoganda 2.0

once a child reads, "illegal because of health problems from smoke" then notices that cigarettes are legal, they walk threw that door of perception that the law is wrong yet the government is fighting a battle on it's own people.

Personal truth is found ... no propaganda engine can brainwash that away with media.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
drug propaganda, university of mississippi's marijuana potency project

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


Sitelinks: Site Functions:

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:33.


Copyright: Substance Information Network 2003 - 2009, All rights reserved