|
| News Groups Blog Forum Chat Video Audio Images Documents Wiki Home |
|
|||||||
| Register | Tags | FAQ n Rules | Mark Forums Read |
| Notices |
| Research Chemicals Piperazines, Phenethylamines, Tryptamines & other Research Chemicals or designer drugs. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
VERY nice discussion here!
SWIM agrees with most of the points and counterpoints made on here. Let's further the discussion about the future of Pipz. SWIY: Do you think that mCPP, MeOPP, TFMPP will be quick to follow in this trend of Pipz criminalization across the world? Note that in the U.S., TFMPP was the ONLY drug to EVER be put in the highest CSA classification (for "immediate scheduling in Schedule 1"), and then after an FDA study, removed from the CSA entirely -- making it currently entirely legal to buy / sell /possess. SWIM thinks this merits MUCH more study on its recreational potential, don't you?!?? -J |
|
#2
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
Re: Dangerous Drugs on sale legally (Piperazine ban imminent in Ireland)
yuck, mCPP, MeOPP and TFMPP all these did was give swm hot flashes, not the inner warmth the euphoria brings on. Matter of fact forgot about euphoria, these were like the first 3 compounds along with BZP to be sold as RCs. Promises esctacy like buzz, but instead swim go a big body load, felt umcomfortable and plan did not have a good time. Swim still has some, but has not used it since 1995. No desire too either. Horrible time. BZP shows positive for meth use, so subsitution that was popular in 2002, could not fool the tests. Swim stilll don't get why people still talk about these ancient RCs, when the 2Cs and DOxs are available. Much better buzz.
|
|
#3
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
Re: Dangerous Drugs on sale legally (Piperazine ban imminent in Ireland)
Quote:
The topic is about piperizines being banned in Ireland where they are commonly sold in headshops. 2c-x/Dox compounds are scheduled here and bear no relevance to this thread. |
|
#4
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
Re: Dangerous Drugs on sale legally (Piperazine ban imminent in Ireland)
Yeah I read the thread and I feel you all are living in the wrong country. Your health minister spokesman is a laughing stock. Wow they are banning anything that alters one state in Ireland. Too bad 2cs and DOxs are scheduled, swim should move to a country where they are still legal like the USA. Plus screw the piperizines, here in the USA we are flooded with crystal meth. 50x the strength of Piperizines, so give that a try, a lot smoother ride and much more rewarding effects. Flush those piperizines.
|
|
#5
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
Re: Dangerous Drugs on sale legally (Piperazine ban imminent in Ireland)
Quote:
|
|
#6
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
Re: Dangerous Drugs on sale legally (Piperazine ban imminent in Ireland)
Sorry dude I gotta agree with podge america bans EVERYTHING in fact lets be honest they also lean on many other countrys to ban everything!!! Leading the way save us all from ourselves God Bless Us All! One nation of facist control freaks under God etc... The fact is Ireland and UK are actually kind of laid back in comparison. And i wouldnt fly the flag for crystal meth as it is a nasty little back room lab created highly addictive and destructive drug.
|
|
#7
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
Re: Dangerous Drugs on sale legally (Piperazine ban imminent in Ireland)
Sorry but the vast array of 2Cs and DOxs and 5meos are legal in the USA. It is not illegal to posses the drug. It gets kinda of tricky if the RC is put on blotter or in a cap, still not illegal to posses. 6 years of GW and they only things banned were 2ct7 and 5meo-dipt. However, there are many sources in India, Germany, China, N Korea that make the stuff, so someone in the US can order from one of these sources legally. It seems like our european friends governments are not as lax as here in the states when it comes to RCs. No the USA did not tell Britian outlaw all of Pikal. Pretty soon Europeans will only be left with dandylions to smoke the way their governments have classified everything. Sure am glad to be in the states. Hey crystal meth, if used sparringly, blows doors on bzp. It is like night and day when comparing the two. BZP - body load, feel awake no euphoria, tingling sensation in hands and feet no thankyou, a bump gets the engine firing on all eight cylinders for the next 12 hours and it is very clean, no body load with rushes of euphoria. Agree it is not for daily use. But isn;t that what people are doing in Ireland, popping BZP daily? Is that healthy?
|
|
#8
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
Re: Dangerous Drugs on sale legally (Piperazine ban imminent in Ireland)
Quote:
I am hardly a proponent of piperizines, read my post history for further details, but to suggest the US is some sort of drug haven is ridiculous. Didn't you schedule piperizines several years ago? Mushrooms were available legally in Ireland up to last year, they have been illegal in the US since the 70's. You yourself have been posting constantly about the DEA's plans to schedule the whole of PIHKAL/TIHKAL. Last edited by Abrad; 09-05-2007 at 19:37. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Scheduling of research chemicals in the US vs Europe
Posts moved to new thread.
The US has an analog law, which is pretty unheard of in Europe. The UK has a pretty large amount of Research chemicals banned. Denmark is prety quick with banning research chemicals as well. Maybe we should list which country has which research chemicals banned. That would be very usefull. |
|
#10
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
Re: Scheduling of research chemicals in the US vs Europe
Canada's pretty easy on the RCs. No tryptamines besides Psilocybin, Psilocin, DET, and DMT are scheduled, and only one 2C-x and a few DOx's are specifically named. I don't think any of the piperazines are scheduled here, but my IUPAC is weak and the gov't here uses a set of conventions that are unfamiliar to me (for example, 2C-B is listed as "4–bromo–2,5–dimethoxybenzeneethanamine").
The following substances which may be considered RCs are Schedule III in Canada (illegal to possess, seek to obtain, or traffic in): DOM DOET DOB DOC DET 2C-B (if I've missed any, why don't you PM me and I can edit this list so it can be a handy reference, rather than cluttering up the thread with "what about Substance X?" posts?) |
|
#11
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
Re: Scheduling of research chemicals in the US vs Europe
Quote:
|
|
#12
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
Re: Scheduling of research chemicals in the US vs Europe
AMT was scheduled wasn't it. Well only three out of how many have been scheduled. Agree, currently the USA is liberal about RCs but this is the calm before the storm. Since 2004 the DEA has been looking at making RCs CSAs and over the next two years were documenting everything it could regarding these chemicals:
|
|
#13
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
Re: Scheduling of research chemicals in the US vs Europe
European laws varies a lot between countries.
there isnt an analogue act, in europe(a part UK) 2C-I, 2CT7, 2CT2 and TMA2 are controlled in all EU, after an EU council about new drugs in 2003. I read somewhere that 2CB is uncontrolled in spain, thoug, it seem strange to me. Greece is tight about tryptamines and piperazines. Belgium also has laws aginst piperazines(tfmpp,meopp, mcpp in particular). Italy, Spain and France are probably the countries with less regulation regarding designer drugs.(no media coverage) Japan has an ambiguous drug attitude: 2CB was sold OTC in shops before scheduling, and most other RC not scheduled are sold legally in shops.however 5-meo-amt was scheduled in summer 2005.the most known tryptamines are also scheduled. Germany seems to follow USA laws, a part for 5-meo-DMT,DOC Sweeden(and probably other scandinavian countries) is tight about RC. those are scheduled in sweeden: N-metyl-1-(3,4-metylendioxifenyl)-2-butylamin (MBDB) 1-(3,4-metylendioxifenyl)-2-butylamin (BDB) N-bensylpiperazin(BZP) 4-klor-2,5-dimetoxiamfetamin (DOC) 5-metoxi-N,N-dimetyltryptamin (5-MeO-DMT) 5-metoxi-N,N-diisopropyltryptamin (5-MeO-DIPT) 5-metoxi-alfametyltryptamin (5-MeO-AMT) 2,5-dimetoxi-4-etylfenetylamin (2C-E) alfa-metyltryptamin (AMT) 2,5-dimetoxi-4-klorfenetylamin (2C-C) 2,5-dimetoxi-4-metylfenetylamin (2C-D) 4-acetoxi-N,N-diisopropyltryptamin (4-AcO-DIPT) 4-hydroxi-N,N-diisopropyltryptamin (4-HO-DIPT) gammabutyrolakton (GBL) 1,4-butandiol (1,4-BD) 3,4-metylendioximetkatinon (Metylon) 4-acetoxi-N,N-metylisopropyltryptamin (4-AcO-MIPT) 4-hydroxi-N,N-metylisopropyltryptamin (4-HO-MIPT) 4-acetoxi-N,N-dietyltryptamin (4-AcO-DET) 4-hydroxi-N,N-dietyltryptamin (4-HO-DET) 1-(3-trifluormetylfenyl)piperazin (TFMPP) salvinorin A In italy the only RC scheduled are DOB,DOM,2C-I, 2CT7, 2CT2,MBDB and TMA2(as from 2003 EU concil). AMT is legal, like all other tryptamines,excluding LSD like substances, AET,DET and DMT. Portugal law is almost like italian law, but with DPT scheduled Considerations: Italy, Spain, France and Portugal have less scheduled RC in the whole EU. Sweeden has tighter regulation in all EU. UK is tight too, but with an analogue act.(however M1 and MDPV can be considered legal because they are ketones instead of PEAs.Also AMT seems to be legal, because it is not considered a trypt analogue) Scandinavian countries, Danmark,Belgium and Greece follow more or less Sweeden regulation, but not so tight. Netherland is the only country(along with sweeden) with Methylone scheduled. Seen on erowid that vicodin is OTC in some EU countries: It isnt. Last edited by Rush; 22-02-2007 at 22:21. |
|
#14
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
Re: Scheduling of research chemicals in the US vs Europe
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
#15
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
Re: Scheduling of research chemicals in the US vs Europe
just wanted to say that japan has a particular attitude towards RC...However japan fits in western style laws, about drug regulation, so it could be interesting discussing about japan law....sorry if got off-topic!about UK, yeah, you're right, I just didn't know how it was called that thing. Thanks for specifing that. |
|
#16
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
Re: Dangerous Drugs on sale legally (Piperazine ban imminent in Ireland)
What ? where did swiy hear this ? Swim has never touched a BZP even though they are legal....in fact swim doesnt know anybody off the top of his head who has taken them ( and swim knows quite a few people who are interested in altered states ).
|
|
#17
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
Re: Scheduling of research chemicals in the US vs Europe
AET is now illegal in switzerland
... but not AMT !!
|
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Scheduling of research chemicals in the US vs Europe
Rush, please edit the code out of your post. I have just upgraded you to silver member, because of the content of that post.
|
|
#19
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
Re: Scheduling of research chemicals in the US vs Europe
Swim now believes that the DEA will be unable to blanket scheduled 1 substances with Dennis Kucinich in charge of the house oversight committee who strongly believes pot should be available for medicinal purposes. He does not like drug laws on the books and wanted to overhaul the sentencing laws of the country. Unfortunately, Pelosi veto the idea saying she did not want democrats to appear soft on crime until the democrats win the white house. Still I can't see the DEA getting away with scheduling 200 drugs, the house committee with Kucinich will not allow 200 additional drugs to be scheduled when the DEA can't prove they are dangerous. That is 200 more materials customs needs to be ready to confiscate and test, So swims prediction that it would occur this summer was written when that ding-a-ling republican from Indiana was running the show, now that he is out of the picture, the odds changed in favor of this scheduling will be shot down.
|
|
#20
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
Re: Scheduling of research chemicals in the US vs Europe
AET is probably illegal worldwide...
|
|
#21
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
Re: Scheduling of research chemicals in the US vs Europe
Ah ? why not amt ?? is the cause the use of AET as pharmaceutical ?
|
|
#22
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
Re: Scheduling of research chemicals in the US vs Europe
Quote:
LINK=[http://whqlibdoc.who.int/trs/WHO_TRS_856.pdf] since i think every country in the world agrees that treaty(maybe some nations dont follow that treaty i dont know)then,if a substance found by the meeting to be harmful,or having an abuse potential is scheduled by those countries. this is also why 2C-B,MBDB,GHB and 4-MTA are scheduled everywhere: they were examined in 2000 LINK=[http://whqlibdoc.who.int/trs/WHO_TRS_903.pdf] [from http://www.who.int/substance_abuse/r.../en/index.html] AMT was a pharmaceutical too (an antidepressive drug), devolped in the 60's like AET, but in the soviet union.however AMT had his popularity peak as a drug, later than AET, in 2003, and then got scheduled in usa(and the places that schedules every new stuff every time) and by now it has not been examined in any of those Committee on Drug Dependence. so this is why it is not scheduled everywhere. hey, i read now AET caused agranulocytosis! thats dangerous...be careful with those chemicals...! Last edited by Rush; 28-02-2007 at 01:31. |
|
#23
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
Re: Scheduling of research chemicals in the US vs Europe
It also causes aplastic anemia or agranulocytosis in some people.. That's a better reason to ban it and something to consider for those who choose to experiment with it. It is a disorder of the bone marrow which often requires a marrow transplant to cure.
|
|
#24
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
Re: Scheduling of research chemicals in the US vs Europe
I've searched around for AET.
The agranulocytosis cases are few, can be an allergic reaction, they should have researched this further. however,AET was examined by the WHO just because somebody(a lot, DEA says) took the chemical for recreational purposes and died. |
|
#25
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
Re: Scheduling of research chemicals in the US vs Europe
Can anybody comment on the following legal definition? I'm trying to determine which RCs are specifically controlled in Ireland:
Quote:
I understand that nearly all common RCs are derived from tryptamine or phenethylamine, but I don't understand the implications of the text above that I put in bold. Apart from that, I found a page on the European Legal Database on Drugs that says the following RCs are controlled throughout Europe: Quote:
That page also had a link to the following chart of drug classifications in European countries, unfortunately it was last updated in 2002, but it verified that at least the following RCs are controlled in Ireland: Quote:
There are probably one or two that I missed on the table, those are the only two I noticed. If anyone can help explain the legal definition I quoted at the start of this post, I'm sure a couple of us Irish members on the forum would greatly appreciate it. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| research chemicals legality |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Interesting scholarly drug facts | rxbandit | Pharmacology | 17 | 30-10-2008 06:53 |
| Sitelinks: | Site Functions: |