Crystal Meth made class A in UK

[MrG]

17/01/07

BBC News website:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6273215.stm



The "euphoric" sex and dance culture drug crystal meth will become a class A drug to avert widespread use in the UK.

People who use methamphetamine - its proper name - now face up to seven years in jail and an unlimited fine, while dealers could be jailed for life.
The addictive drug can lead to paranoia, depression, violence, kidney failure, internal bleeding and less inhibited sexual behaviour.
Drug charity DrugScope has welcomed the "sensible precautionary move".
Other risks associated with the synthetic stimulant, which can be smoked or injected, include dental problems and tooth decay.
I believe tougher penalties send a strong message that dealing and making crystal meth will not be tolerated


Home Office minister Vernon Coaker


Although DrugScope supports the move, it has now called for additional resources and training for "frontline" drug and healthcare workers.
Martin Barnes, DrugScope's chief executive, said: "Services for stimulant users have improved considerably over the last five years but, as there is no viable substitute drug, services rely on specialist talking therapies for clients.
"Significant investment is needed to ensure that there are appropriate services for people using the whole range of stimulants such as amphetamine, cocaine, crack cocaine and crystal meth, right across the UK."
Moving the drug to class A, alongside heroin and cocaine, means the police and the Serious Organised Crime Agency will make tackling it an even higher priority.
On Thursday, the Home Office will release horrific photographs showing the drug's effects on two women in the United States, which demonstrate how crystal meth smoking can lead to rapid ageing and to "meth mouth", a chronic rotting of teeth and gums.
'Tougher penalties'
Home Office minister Vernon Coaker said: "We know from the experiences of other countries that it has the potential to ruin the lives of individuals and their families.
"Reclassification is a precautionary measure that helps to ensure crystal meth does not gain a foothold in the UK.
"I believe tougher penalties send a strong message that dealing and making crystal meth will not be tolerated."
Other street names for the drug include ice, crazy medicine and go-fast.
It is also known as Nazi crank - after an apocryphal story that Adolf Hitler injected the substance twice daily.
'A global problem'
American singer Rufus Wainwright is among the celebrities who have admitted former addictions to the synthetic drug.
Simon Bray, Association of Chief Police Officers (Acpo) spokesman and commander in the Metropolitan Police, said: "Reclassifying the drug gives us some important new tools with which to clamp down on those who might be tempted to import methamphetamine or produce it locally."
Director general of the Serious Organised Crime Agency (Soca) Bill Hughes also welcomed the move, which was first announced last June.
Use of crystal meth is already a major concern in several countries including the US, Australia, Thailand and Japan. In March last year, the United Nations' drug control agency - the International Narcotics Control Board - said crystal meth was becoming a global problem.

[darawk]

Though it saddens me to see any tightening of drug laws, I have to say that this one at least makes sense. Meth should always have been classified similarly to drugs like heroin and especially cocaine, the fact that it ever wasn't is almost as ridiculous as the fact that shrooms are still Class A.

[monkeygone2heaven]

my feelings exactly.

Originally Posted by darawk

Though it saddens me to see any tightening of drug laws, I have to say that this one at least makes sense. Meth should always have been classified similarly to drugs like heroin and especially cocaine, the fact that it ever wasn't is almost as ridiculous as the fact that shrooms are still Class A.

[Lunar Loops]

Yes, but what actual difference is the re-classification going to make? The following article from the Transform Drug Policy Foundation website (UK) sums it up for SWIS:

Meth is Class A - we can relax now.


So methamphetamine is, as of yesterday, a Class A drug. Well thank heavens for that, now we have nothing to worry about.

I am reliably informed that all the people who were really looking forward to trying it as a Class B drug have decided its just not worth the risk – the idea of 7 years in prison instead of a mere 5 was just too serious a worry. They are going to stick with old-school Class B amphetamines instead (but take twice as much).

And as for all the meth dealers and producers who before yesterday were lining up to cash in on the imminent meth epidemic, they too have apparently decided it’s just not worth the risk of life in prison and an ‘unlimited fine’ for nasty Class A dealing, and have decided to quit the life of crime go straight instead. Its just not like the good old days when meth was pansy-ish Class B and all they had to worry about was a piffling 14 years in prison and measely ‘unlimited fine’.

British kids saved from the meth epidemic by reclassification, photographed this-morning:



Hmmm. Maybe its time for a reality check.

Reclassifying will not prevent people producing it, selling it or using it. Meth has been Schedule 1 (equivalent of Class A) in the USA and Canada since way before their respective meth epidemics began, and over there people frequently get the obscenely long sentences the statute books threaten.

Maybe this suggests we should be even tougher? Maybe we should try the Thailand approach where selling the drug is likely to get you executed by the police. A horrific 2000 people were killed in Thailand's 2003 'drug crackdown'. Now that’s what I call tough! Nothing like those sissies in the Home Office.

Unfortunately, wholesale slaughter doesn’t seem to have worked either – the country still has the highest meth consumption in the world, in the region of 800 million tablets being consumed a year according to the Lancet .

Despite these grim tales from around the world, in Wednesday's Home Office press release an ACPO spokesperson is quoted reiterating the evidence-free myth that ‘people will be deterred by the penalties for making, dealing or using methylamphetmine’ . ACPO also state that ‘production and use of this drug in all its forms will now be substantially easier to combat as a result of this reclassification’ because ‘It will also become possible to close down, for long periods, premises used as illicit 'meth' laboratories (a power for Class A drugs only).’ You have to wonder if ACPO have bothered to look at the experience overseas or not, because if they have they can hardly be filled with optimism. Surely, after all these years of failure with heroin and crack, they must know that this sort of enforcement approach simply does not work, and can arguably make things worse by further inflating price for users and correspondingly increasing the volume of crime committed by addicts to support their habits (ref; heroin and crack).

Infact it is amazing really that the Government and police are still trumpeting this reclassification as any kind of sensible core response to the methamphetamine threat - despite the lack of evidence from anywhere that it will make the slightest difference. The Science and Technology Select Committee recently took a long hard look at the classification system and found it ‘was not fit for purpose’, hadn't achieved its stated aims (infact it had done the exact opposite), was unevaluated and was based on a series of false assumptions about its deterrent effects. But you don’t really need a select committee inquiry to figure that out. The idea that the classification system provides any useful public health information to young people, is an effective deterrent, or reduces drug use, production or supply is frankly laughable – just look at our experience over the last 36 years. (I have blogged – in bordering on tedious detail - about the classification system and deterrence, the Sci/Tech Committee report and the Government’s pitiful response to it here and there is a Transform briefing on the problems with the classification system, with links to the committee report, here).

Classification is almost entirely irrelevant to levels of use and availability;

- Ecstasy use went from zero to 2 million pills a week in the late 80s early 90s, it was Class A all the time, now its going down
- Cocaine use is rising sharply and it has always been Class A
- Crack use went from zero to ‘epidemic’ use in a couple of years and it has always been Class A
- Heroin has risen by more than 1000% (that's three zeros) over a period of 30 years and has been Class A all along
- Availablity of all major Class A drugs has increased steadily year on year

Perhaps more suprisingly, major players in drug field also offer qualified support for the move, including Drugscope which supports it ‘as a sensible precautionary move’ and Addaction who repeat the ACPO line that it ‘will allow the police to tackle crystal meth more effectively’. Both Drugscope and Addaction caveat their support with eminently sensible calls for better treatment and education services to be developed in anticipation of rising meth use, although this does suggest they can’t be overly confident that the reclassification is going to be effective at preventing much. But this support, albeit qualified, does beg the question of whether they think it is useful or indeed ethical for problem meth users (the clients these organisations are set up to support) to be criminalised and imprisoned? By supporting increased penalties you have to assume that is their position (even though I dont think it is).

This seems especially odd for Drugscope, which has gone on the record calling for ‘Criminal procedures’ to ‘no longer be initiated for the possession of small amounts of any scheduled drug’ on the basis that ‘there is no evidence that the availability of imprisonment deters simple possession or that it is effective longer term in stopping drug use’.

OK, in the context of the classification harm-rankings system as it stands, the move makes 'sense' - and lets be clear that no one is denying meth use is a serious health risk - BUT the ABC ranking system itself has no established public health benefits and is primarily used to determine the hierarchy of penalties that form the core of our drug policy. It is grotesquely unfair, malfunctioning, unscientific, and yes, it actually makes things worse - It actively increases harms (not that the Government bothers to evaluate it against meaningful indicators).

Whatever you say about other service provision, supporting the re-classification means support for increasing criminalisation, punishment and imprisonment of users - fact.

[Ice_Cream_Man]

has anyone ever seen anyone sprung on crystal meth? i would say that the effects are a hell of a lot worse than heroin or crack.

[baron samedi]

Wether or not meth is worse or better than crack/heroin SWIM cannot see the logic of a drug charity supporting heavier sentences for meth users. Shroomongers post just about sums it up.
Loved the use of a Jehovah's Witness leaflet in the post, by the way. SWIM has had that one through his door before, lol.

[mansoormir]

Regarding the relative harmfulness of crystal compared to other drugs it's worth having a look at the article in the Lancet published recently by David Nutt. Nutt and colleagues have attempted to draw up a more objective ranking of various drugs by rating things like health costs and social costs.

Whilst crystal meth is not seperated out in their analysis they do place amphetamine much lower down the list than heroin or crack cocaine.