Judge rejects counties' challenge to California marijuana law - Drugs Forum
Drugs-Forum  
News Groups Blog Forum Chat Video Audio Images Documents Wiki Home
Go Back   Drugs Forum > VARIOUS DRUG RELATED TOPICS > Law and order
Register Tags Mark Forums Read

Notices

Law and order Drug law, arrests, court cases, law enforcement & the legal situation of drugs.

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old 07-12-2006, 05:46
jholmes800's Avatar
jholmes800 jholmes800 is offline
Titanium Member
 
Join Date: 04-10-2006
Location: japan
Age: 29
Posts: 156
jholmes800 is a captain of the SWIM team.jholmes800 is a captain of the SWIM team.jholmes800 is a captain of the SWIM team.
Points: 1,564, Level: 6 Points: 1,564, Level: 6 Points: 1,564, Level: 6
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Judge rejects counties' challenge to California marijuana law

A state judge on Wednesday upheld California's law permitting the use of medical marijuana for medical purposes, rejecting a lawsuit by three counties challenging the decade-old statute.

The counties, led by San Diego, argued that local governments shouldn't be bound to uphold state laws that are weaker than the federal blanket ban on marijuana.

San Diego County sued California and its health services director in February over a state requirement that counties issue identification cards for medical marijuana users and maintain a registry of people who apply for the cards. San Bernardino and Merced counties joined the suit.

State attorneys responded that California was entitled to pass its own laws suspending state prosecution for medical marijuana use, and to legislate programs enabling qualified users to access the drug.

Marijuana users in California can still be prosecuted under federal drug laws.

Superior Court Judge William R. Nevitt, Jr., wrote in his ruling counties would not be breaking federal law by giving out state identification cards.

"Requiring the counties to issue identification cards for the purpose of identifying those whom California chooses not to arrest and prosecute for certain activities involving marijuana use does not create a 'positive conflict,'" Nevitt wrote.

The ruling affirmed a tentative judgment Nevitt issued in November.

The judge emphasized that he was not weighing in on the question of whether marijuana has medical benefits.

Since 55 percent of California voters approved the law in a 1996 vote, 10 other states have adopted measures protecting qualified patients from prosecution. They are Alaska, Colorado, Hawaii, Maine, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington.

Thomas Bunton, a county attorney who argued the case, said no decision had been made whether to seek an appeal.

Nevitt's ruling stopped short of forcing the counties to begin issuing the cards. Fewer than half of California's 58 counties have so far complied with the state program.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...45S10.DTL&feed
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Club Pot Med (Feature on medical marijuana in Washington) Bajeda Law and order 2 23-12-2008 04:29
Interesting scholarly drug facts rxbandit Pharmacology 17 30-10-2008 06:53
Drug info - Cannabis Myths and Facts vantranist Cannabis using 8 22-07-2008 07:27
Marinol vs. Marijuana: Politics, Science, and Popular Culture Alfa Cannabis 1 27-12-2006 00:09
The Untold Story grecian Cannabis using 3 10-10-2006 23:13


Sitelinks: Site Functions:

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 18:49.


Copyright: Substance Information Network 2003 - 2009, All rights reserved