COPS CANNOT FISH FOR EVIDENCE - Drugs Forum
Drugs-Forum  
News Groups Blog Forum Chat Video Audio Images Documents Wiki Home
Go Back   Drugs Forum > VARIOUS DRUG RELATED TOPICS > Drug News > Miscellaneous News
Register Tags Mark Forums Read

Notices

Miscellaneous News Miscellaneous News about drugs

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 24-07-2004, 15:08
Alfa's Avatar
Alfa Alfa is offline
Alfa is temporary out of order
Productive insomniac
Administrator
 
Join Date: 14-01-2003
Location: Netherlands
Age: 94
Posts: 20,329
Blog Entries: 2
Alfa is a true resource and beyond reputeAlfa is a true resource and beyond reputeAlfa is a true resource and beyond reputeAlfa is a true resource and beyond reputeAlfa is a true resource and beyond reputeAlfa is a true resource and beyond reputeAlfa is a true resource and beyond reputeAlfa is a true resource and beyond reputeAlfa is a true resource and beyond reputeAlfa is a true resource and beyond reputeAlfa is a true resource and beyond repute
Points: 122,941, Level: 50 Points: 122,941, Level: 50 Points: 122,941, Level: 50
Activity: 94% Activity: 94% Activity: 94%

COPS CANNOT FISH FOR EVIDENCE

OTTAWA (CP) -- Police with reasonable suspicions have the power to
detain people temporarily but can't go on "fishing expeditions" in
their pockets for evidence, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled Friday.

It was the first time the high court had examined an everyday police
practice that many law officers and prosecutors take for granted.

The decision upholds a ruling by a trial judge in Winnipeg, who
acquitted Phillip Henry Mann of trafficking after police stopped him
on the street in relation to a nearby break-and-enter and found almost
an ounce of pot in his sweatshirt pouch.

"Individuals have a reasonable expectation of privacy in their
pockets," Justice Frank Iacobucci wrote in a majority decision that
divided the high court 5-2.

"The search here went beyond what was required to mitigate concerns
about officer safety and reflects a serious breach of (Mann's)
protection against unreasonable search and seizure."

The court agreed, however, that police can briefly detain a person for
investigative purposes, provided they have reasonable grounds to
suspect the person is connected to a particular crime.

Police can also do a pat-down search if they reasonably believe the
person presents a safety risk.

But reaching into someone's pocket because they feel something soft,
as happened in the Mann case, doesn't cut it, said the court.

"The search must be grounded in objectively discernible facts to
prevent 'fishing expeditions' on the basis of irrelevant or
discriminatory factors," wrote Iacobucci.

Mann, a native, was walking in a high-crime area of downtown Winnipeg
near midnight on Dec. 23, 2000, when police approached him after
reports of a break-in a few blocks away.

He was acquitted at his initial trial, but that judgment was
overturned on appeal.

The Supreme Court decision puts an end to the matter.


Source: Canadian Press (Canada Wire)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 24-07-2004, 15:13
searcher's Avatar
searcher Gold member searcher is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: 23-04-2004
Location: United States
Age: 56
Posts: 610
searcher is an unknown quantity at this point
Points: 3,159, Level: 8 Points: 3,159, Level: 8 Points: 3,159, Level: 8
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Canada seems to be trying to give its citizens the freedoms an open society should have. The average guy in the US is loosing more and more freedom and rights every day.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
search rules, unreasonable search and seizure

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


Sitelinks: Site Functions:

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 19:08.


Copyright: Substance Information Network 2003 - 2009, All rights reserved