|
| News Groups Blog Forum Chat Video Audio Images Documents Wiki Home |
|
|||||||
| Register | Tags | FAQ n Rules | Mark Forums Read |
| Notices |
| DMT, DMT plants and Ayahuasca DMT, Phalaris, Yopo, Mimosa, Virola & Ayahuasca |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
I've asked around and no one I've talked to seems to even heard of it, and I really want some! |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
For DMT containing plants, see the sources forum. Do not ask for sources here. Do not ask for DMT itself, because it is illegal and therefore asking for it will get you banned. |
|
#3
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
go hang out with hippies. there are always some at the phish showes and the bigger fest. such as bonnaroo , the vibes, exct. it is usualy arouind 300 a gram or 30 a tenth if u buy a bunch u can get it for like 250. cheack out jambase.com for festivels |
|
#4
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
dmt seems really rare anymore i havent found a dealer yet that has it |
|
#5
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
Why almost all dmt experiences have a tendency to be different than
ayahuasca or pharma-? Regardless of MAOI's; they have taken in both cases (vaporization and oral ingestion). Seems to be that aya is more shroom like and dmt more unique and blessed. By the way I don't like the word drug when one is spoken about psychedelics or yet better entheogens. |
|
#6
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
DMT is rare because it's not the kind of experience that appeals to everyone and it's not the kind of thing you do often. Keep asking around, eventually you'll find a friend of a friend who has it.
|
|
#7
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
5meo-dmt is a related compound which is much easier to find,and much more potent.the effects are said to be like an elephant sitting on your face,sounds really scary not for the weak at heart thats for sure
|
|
#8
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
i was given 5meo once which was called real dmt. it felt like white-noise-rapture covering all the senses. rather paralyzing.
heads these days assume that white colored dmt is synthetic (5meo) and that yellow-tinged dmt is natural (straight dmt). of course if you extract yours from mimosa hostilis root bark (preferred) using the nice methods described at dmt.lycaeum.org and recrystallize from hexane you can make bright white natural dmt crystals that everyone will accuse of being synthetic. real dmt is the most beautiful and terrifying drug on the planet. damn good medicene indeed. |
|
#9
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
Quote:
5-meo-dmt is NOT THE SAME as DMT |
|
#10
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
Quote:
I realize this is an old thread, but DMT containing plants are legally available and thus their vendors are not prone to the amount of scamming the other quasi-legal drugs and analogs on the net tend to fall towards. Or so a rat, who just crawled out of my wall, told me... |
|
#11
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
I'd probably have to recommend that one tries ayahuasca first before even thinking about smoking DMT. Get used to it's gentler side first, DMT is like getting hit in the head by a psychadelic bat. I don't know your history, but be careful screwing with this one, it'll screw you back if you're not prepared. Peace, D. |
|
#12
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
But to try ayahuasca means obtaining illegal MAOI's
At least in Canada |
|
#13
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
There are many MAOI's, not all of which are illegal. Although not the traditional way, it'll work just fine. ![]() Peace, D. |
|
#14
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
yikes!
I'm sorry.. I guess I haven't read enough! My apologies. Can you tip me off whether you're talking about plant sources - or diverted pharmacutical sources. |
|
#15
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
syrian rue is one natural MAOI
|
|
#16
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
Quote:
Erowid: Quote:
Damn! Looks like for once the US is acutally less restrictive than Canada. |
|
#17
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
Look around on there, there are plenty of other alternatives. I'm pretty sure harmaline is controlled in the US too. Peace, D> |
|
#18
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
Hmm .. According to Erowid there are many different plant species, but the alkaloids in question are always the same
Harmaline & salts alkaloids are schedule III in Canada (as a benchmark - thats the same as amphetamines) Perhaps using a fast acting reversible MAOI (such as moclobemide) might yield an ayahuasca? Ironically, I don't think it's approved for use in the states. ![]() |
|
#19
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
Mocloemide works... But I would not recommend it. It make the whole thing seem plastic. Go natural
|
|
#20
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
Moclobemide has actually become quite a popuar substitute for harmala alkaloids.
As to the original question. Its highly unlikely you will find DMT unless you extract it yourself or know some one that does this. |
|
#21
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
Harmaline is not scheduled in US as far as I know.My dogordered it a long time ago from Sigma, not personally of course. My dog took 200mg dissolved in just enough weak HCL orally. in about 30-40 min. very nauseating, unable to stand any light hardly, bright blue flashes of CEV's , definitely trippy in a head -sick sort of way don't recommend |
|
#22
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
Some plants that contain MAOIs like harmaline include Syrian Rue
(Peganum harmala), passion flower (Passiflora incarnata--sp?), Diploteris caberana (but with several other alkaloids including tryptamines in potentially active amounts ), and of course Banisteriopsis caapi and other Banisteriopsis species. I'm surprised about the Canadian scheduling of harmaline, but regardless of the chemical's regulation, plants containing it or related MAOI alkaloids should be unrestricted (unless the plant species is specifically listed in the legislation, it is not considered a controlled substance). Of these I've listed, Syrian rue is the most potent (a crystalline extract can be derived without too much difficulty), followed by the Banisteriopsis ssp., and with passion flower a somewhat distant third. I didn't include the Diploteris because it contains so many additional active alkaloids that it's not really a good candidate for an MAOI potentiation source. In fact, it's almost like ayahuasca all in one plant. Be sure to take it easy on the Syrian rue, especially an extract. It is quite easy to overshoot the mark with MAOIs (200mg. of harmaline as mentioned above or 3+ grams of powdered Syrian rue is far too much IMO), exceeding an effective enzyme-inhibiting dose to the point where the psychoactivity of the MAOIs themselves are tainting or overpowering the experience, sometimes even encouraging nausea and sedation. IMO 1 to 1.5 grams of powerdered Syrian rue for a 150 lb. person is plenty to achieve enzyme inhibition (taken approx. 30 min. before the DMT or other entheogen to be potentiated is consumed, and any amount much greater than that and one experiences nausea and sedation. For pure harmine/harmaline HCl, a "smear"/"bump" on the tongue about 1/2 cm. in diameter and less than 1mm. thick is sufficient for MAO inhibition. I apologize for the inexactness of the measurement, it's probably somewhere around 10-20 mg. Passion flower seems to be rather weak and although a cup of the tea or a dietary supplement type of the encapsulated herb ingested produces calm and relaxation, I imagine that to inhibit one's enzymes enough to ensure an ayahuasca-like effect that either a very potent extract or an unreasonably large amount of the plant material would have to be consumed. I have no personal experience with the Banisteriopsis species as an MAOI. In regard to the 5-MeO/n,n-DMT mix-ups, I touched upon this in another post in the DMT section. DMT is illegal and thus more rare vs. 5-MeO being unscheduled and also more potent, the two subtances have similar names and are administered in a similar fashion, people are out for profits, etc. The important thing is the difference in active dose and the subjective effects of the two substances. Be careful and know your source. DMT is a unique and powerful substance, and although it is sometimes touted as the ultimate experience of consciousness, and greatly sought after by some, it is definitely "not for everyone" and certainly not the type of recreational drug that any "dealer" would have. When I was younger I used to fantasize that my cannabis dealer somehow had access to a drug black market posessing any illicit psychedelic I could think of, and I would pester the hell out of him by regularly asking of they could "hook up" things like peyote, DMT, yopo, STP, or anything else I had read was psychedelic. I just assumed that if it was illegal and psyhcoactive, taht it could be "scored" somehow (isn't that what all the drug war propaganda tends to imply?) DMT is just one of those things that is both rare and novel and as a result it is often only encountered in the circles of "in-the-know" entheogen conneiseurs. I do agree however that you have a better chance of finding these "entheophiles" and the substances they appreciate at festivals such as Autonomous Mutant, Burning Man, Rainbow Gatherings, Goa or PsyTrance outdoor parties/festivals, or some of the concert tours mentioned above. Of course, conferences such as MindStates, Entheobotany seminars, or any other events focused around entheogens, shamanism, and alternate states of consciousness are densely populated with people who probably know about such things as DMT. But in spite of this, one of the oddest things about DMT is its majickal, synchronistic quality-- it can and often does suddenly appear when and where you least expect it, but somehow it seems to come into one's hands when he or she is "ready" for the experience. Perhaps DMT is not as available as other things because it's not "meant" to be so, and it's the "entities/elves" whom are in control of when you shall meet one another... <!-- var SymRealOnLoad; var SymReal; Sym() { window.open = SymWinOpen; if(SymReal != null) SymReal(); } SymOnLoad() { if(SymRealOnLoad != null) SymRealOnLoad(); window.open = SymRealWinOpen; SymReal = window.; window. = Sym; } SymRealOnLoad = window.onload; window.onload = SymOnLoad; //--> |
|
#23
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
Quote:
Actually, not the case. Plants do not have to be specifically named in Canada to be illegal. From the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act (first couple pages actually .. ) Quote:
.... Quote:
Actually .. according to this mushroom spores are technically illegal. ![]() |
|
#24
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
<!--
var SymRealOnLoad; var SymReal; Sym() { window.open = SymWinOpen; if(SymReal != null) SymReal(); } SymOnLoad() { if(SymRealOnLoad != null) SymRealOnLoad(); window.open = SymRealWinOpen; SymReal = window.; window. = Sym; } SymRealOnLoad = window.onload; window.onload = SymOnLoad; //--> Hmmm... I will not go so far as to say you are wrong, but what you have referenced above still does not explicitly imply that such a plant is illegal. Furthermore, I assume that mescaline is listed by name as a controlled substance in Canada, along with "its salts, isomers-" blah blah. Yet the peyote cactus (Lophophora williamsii) as well as other mescaline-containing cacti are not prohibited and are in fact available from Canadian ethnobotanical suppliers (which will of course not be named here). The same example holds true for n,n-DMT and plants such as Mimosa hostilis and Psychotria viridis. In fact, I recall on ethnobotanical outlet in Canada that had "ayahuasca herbs" that were sold together which consisted of Psychotria viridis and Banisteriopsis caapi (!), which has harmine and harmaline as its active components. My interpretation of the legislation you have quoted (I am not a lawyer) is as follows: (b) a reference to a controlled substance includes a reference to (i) all synthetic and natural forms of the substance -- This refers to the origin of the substance in and of itself, not the product of origin per se (i.e. synthetic, lab-made DMT is considered the same as purified, extracted DMT, regardless of their seperate origin.) (ii) any thing that contains or has on it a controlled substance and that is used or intended or designed for use (A) in producing the substance, or (B) in introducing the substance into a human body. The "and" is very important here, because it qualifies the definition. This means that you could theoretically be prosecuted for a resinated hash pipe, because it not only "has on it" THC residue but ALSO "is used or intended or designed for use in (B) introducing it into a human body. The same case could be made if you had a knife that was used to scrape opium from poppy seedpods, in that it 1) has on it a controlled substance (opium), and 2) is intended or designed for use in (A) producing a controlled substance. (ii) is qualified only when criteria for (A) OR (B) is also met; (A) and (B) do not both have to be met What this is getting at is that INTENT is key. Studies have shown that there are detectable amounts of cocaine on 90% of circulating US currency, and also that all human beings posess detectable amount of DMT as a metabolic component, excreted in the urine. But because neither the currency or the bodies/urine are INTENDED for using or produsing the drug, they would not be explicity illegal. However, both could theoretically be considered illegal by the US law defining of possesion of a controlled substance illegal if found "in any amount", which presumably would include these absurd examples. The same argument is used for research chemicals, which are ALWAYS sold and purchased "not for human consumption", for if they were sold or packaged in such a manner as to imply beyond a reasonable doubt that they WERE in fact intended for human consumption, then they become de facto controlled substances. The only part of the definition which may in fact support your argument that I can see is: (a) a reference to a controlled substance includes a reference to any substance that contains a controlled substance; and It depends upon whether a plant is considered a "substance" per se, and if because the "and" is there after a semicolon, if parts (a) and (b) of the definition are co-dependent or are mutally exclusive (i.e. are they 2 seperate parameters that define what a controlled substance includes, or are they both part of one singular definition that is dependent on both criteria to be filled in order to be considered a valid definition.) Based on the examples I have given of peyote and the other plants, I am ASSUMING (I am NOT a lawyer) that this Canadian law is enforced and interpreted in a similar fashion to the American controlled substance analog laws. This means that if a plant or animal that is not explicitly named in the legislation contains a controlled substance, but does not demonstrate that it is intended 1) for the production of a controlled substance, 2) to enter the human body (i.e. for human consumption), and 3) to be used as a controlled substance in and of itself, then the plant or animal in question is NOT considered a controlled substance. It's good that you are paying attention to the letter of the law-- things like this can bite you in the ass when you least expect it. But I'll bet that any plants that are obviously prohibited in Canada (non-hemp cannabis being one) that they are explcitly listed in the legislation. This is the case in the US with Cannabis sativa and indica, Erythroxylon(sp?) coca, Lophophora wiliamsii, Tabernanthe iboga, and Catha edulis. The wording even contains further definitions like "the roots, seeds, stem, foliage, etc., of the plant", so as not to allow any room for loopholes. |
|
#25
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
i think i am going to smoke Anadenanthera seed,baking soda yopo blend, but i want to smoke it inmy vaporizer. will thealkaloids be activated by the vap primarely used for cannabis? |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| dmt in nature, find dmt, natural dmt, sources of dmt, where to get dmt |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| TEK - Idiots Guide for using DMT | Synesthesiac | DMT, DMT plants and Ayahuasca | 21 | 02-11-2009 09:37 |
| Plants Containing DMT and Relative Advantages of Each | Dimitri | DMT, DMT plants and Ayahuasca | 30 | 31-05-2008 13:01 |
| DMT abstraction/thoughts - conversation with a mad man | raven3davis | DMT, DMT plants and Ayahuasca | 2 | 22-08-2007 19:44 |
| Dr. DMT: Strassman Interviewed | enquirewithin | DMT, DMT plants and Ayahuasca | 4 | 15-08-2006 03:39 |
| Sitelinks: | Site Functions: |