Americans Want Medical Marijuana - Drugs Forum
Drugs-Forum  
News Groups Blog Forum Chat Video Audio Images Documents Wiki Home
Go Back   Drugs Forum > VARIOUS DRUG RELATED TOPICS > Drug News > Miscellaneous News
Register Tags Mark Forums Read

Notices

Miscellaneous News Miscellaneous News about drugs

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 20-05-2006, 22:15
mopsie's Avatar
mopsie Gold member mopsie is offline
mopsie is geod gek
Donating Gold Member
 
Join Date: 14-04-2005
Location: In mopsie's castel
Age: 28
Posts: 1,100
mopsie probably knows what they are talking about.mopsie probably knows what they are talking about.mopsie probably knows what they are talking about.mopsie probably knows what they are talking about.mopsie probably knows what they are talking about.
Points: 7,810, Level: 12 Points: 7,810, Level: 12 Points: 7,810, Level: 12
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Americans Want Medical Marijuana

AMERICANS WANT MEDICAL MARIJUANA

When there is a big gap between the views of ordinary Americans on a public issue and the voting record of their elected representatives in Congress, something is wrong. In the current debate over the use of marijuana for medical purposes, Americans and their representatives seem to be living on different planets.

Poll after poll shows Americans, by a huge majority, want their doctors, not lawmakers, to decide whether or not marijuana should be used as a medicine. Today, however, federal laws prohibit physicians from prescribing marijuana for pain relief even where state and local laws say it is OK to do so. This has not always been the case.

"For most of American history, growing and using marijuana was legal under both federal law and the laws of individual states," according to a recent report by the Congressional Research Service, an arm of the U.S. Congress.

The report goes on to say, "From 1850 to the early 1940s cannabis was included in the U.S. Pharmacopoeia as a recognized medicinal. [But] its decline in medicine was hastened by the development of aspirin, morphine, and other opium-derived drugs, all of which helped to replace marijuana in the treatment of pain."

In a 1999 Gallup poll, 73 percent of Americans said they would vote for making marijuana legally available for doctors to prescribe in order to reduce pain and suffering. Similar polls in 2003 and 2005 found 75 percent and 78 percent support, respectively.

Apparently members of Congress don't read the polls these days, nor do they care much about state laws. In 12 states -- Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Maine, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington -- laws already give doctors the power to decide whether to use marijuana to treat patients in pain.

In the U.S. House of Representatives, on May 4, 2005, Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., introduced H.R. 2087, a bill "to provide for the medical use of marijuana in accordance with the laws of the various states," and to prohibit the federal government from stopping "an individual from obtaining and using marijuana from a prescription or recommendation by a physician for medical use." It remains stuck in the Energy and Commerce Committee.

Since a federal bill allowing states to regulate the medical use of marijuana can't make it to the House floor for an up or down vote, an alternative strategy is to attach a medical marijuana amendment to a spending bill that will reach the House floor. On June 15, 2005, Rep. Maurice D. Hinchey, D-N.Y., did just that and offered Amendment 272 to H.R. 2862. The amendment would have prohibited federal agencies from preventing the implementation of state laws that authorize the use of medical marijuana. It was rejected on a 264-to-161 vote.

In other words, while 78 percent of Americans favor letting doctors and states decide this issue, only 38 percent of House members favored a law supporting that policy. Nationally, a whopping 40 percent medical marijuana gap separates what the American people want and what their hard-of-hearing elected representatives deliver.

The gap is even larger in Virginia, where eight of the 11 House members from Virginia voted against Amendment 272 and the will of three out of four Americans. Assuming the national polls fairly reflect the opinions of Virginia voters, eight members from Virginia ought to have supported the amendment instead of only three. Roanoke area Reps. Virgil Goode and Bob Goodlatte, both Republicans, voted against the amendment while Rick Boucher, a Democrat, voted for it.

American democracy calls on lawmakers to be responsive to the common sense wisdom of ordinary citizens. Elected officials from Virginia need to start listening to the people who want their physicians, not politicians, to decide whether marijuana should be used to ease suffering in sick patients. If Virginia's current members of Congress don't improve their hearing, voters might consider replacing them in November with people who have better listening skills.


source mapt
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
barney frank, medical cannabis, medical marijuana, medical pot

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Drug Dictionary - Terms, Slang & Abbreviations ~lostgurl~ About Drugs Forum 36 05-10-2009 16:58
USA - What states have medical marijuana laws? fnord Drug Policy Reform & Narco Politics 2 15-06-2009 03:04
Nevada's Move Towards Decriminalization (Collection) Bajeda Politics (News) 1 09-08-2006 03:07
Medical marijuana debate renews ShadyMilkman Miscellaneous News 2 25-01-2006 12:42


Sitelinks: Site Functions:

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:28.


Copyright: Substance Information Network 2003 - 2009, All rights reserved